Talk:Aircraft lease

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Quisqualis in topic forms of aircraft leasing

Simplysavvy (talk) 06:19, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Stub?

edit

Not sure it's a stub. Not much more to be said on the subject. Harry was a white dog with black spots 05:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

-- How about explaining the mysterious "wet" vs. "dry", "damp" etc. terminology? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.13.26.148 (talk) 21:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)Reply


It's now explained in the article and the merger would do no harm to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msaky (talkcontribs) 22:28, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Blanking references

edit

There is no reason to revert references if valid and relevant. --Kukini hablame aqui 17:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wasn't sure the Indigo reference was valid. It looked like spam to me in its intial incarnation. It's just a list of available aircraft. But with the additional paragraph I think it's OK. Harry was a white dog with black spots 17:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Understood. We might want articles on "Dry Lease" and "Damp Lease" as well. --Kukini hablame aqui 17:39, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

forms of aircraft leasing

edit

seems like wet/damp/moist/dry/frigid leasing aren't broad enough subjects to each need their own article. therefore, i suggest that this be moved to something like forms of aircraft leasing, or simply milled into aircraft finance. pauli133 (talk) 16:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

An article on aircraft leasing makes sense. Although closely relating to aircraft finance, I don't think they are coextensive, so splitting them probably makes more sense. --Legis (talk - contribs) 17:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Agree seems better to explain the different arrangements on one page. MilborneOne (talk) 19:19, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Agree, whether on aircraft finance or aircraft leasing, either is fine with me. - BillCJ (talk) 19:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
If we go with a new combined article, I'd recommend moving Wet lease to aircraft leasing, as it has a much longer efit history, and making Dry lease a redirect there. An admin would probably have to delete the current aircraft leasing first. - BillCJ (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
I've been BOLD, and moved the page to Aircraft lease (noun form). It needs a Lead (I have no idea what to say in it!), and the text could use some reorganization. Sorry for leaving it half done, but I wanted to jump-start the merging. - BillCJ (talk) 11:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Should this article discuss the change to airline balance sheets given the accounting changes embodied in IFRS 16 Leases?58.6.169.136 (talk) 02:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but not to excessive lengths. And cite sources.--Quisqualis (talk) 06:43, 9 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Damp Lease

edit

As it appears in FedEx Express, the term "damp lease" links here, but that's the end of it. The term is not mentioned in this article. Clarification, please? Mfwills (talk) 06:21, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Origin of terms "wet leases" and "dry lease".

edit

I heard years ago that the origin of the terms "wet leases" and "dry lease" came from the fact that a wet lease contract was for a longer period of time and thus was painted in the livery of the company. Dry leases, being shorter, weren't painted. Any truth in this.--Dmol (talk) 21:45, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

This article could do with more content and clarification of existing content

edit

Two useful sources so far -

http://www.pkair.com/pdf/article1.pdf

http://www.pwc.com/en_GX/gx/aerospace-defence/publications/assets/pwc-aviation-finance-fastern-your-seat-belts-pdf.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by James warne aus (talkcontribs) 14:36, 5 August 2013 (UTC)Reply