Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Hacksaw Ridge/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Contents
List of accolades received by Hacksaw Ridge edit
List of accolades received by Hacksaw Ridge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
I have expanded the article over the last few days, and it follows the same structure as many other current FLs. My Interstellar nomination has received three supports, so I am adding a second nomination. Sgubaldo (talk) 19:22, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments edit
- "with particular recognition for Gibson's direction, Garfield's performance, as well as" => "with particular recognition for Gibson's direction and Garfield's performance, as well as"
- All the notes with the exception of A are not complete sentences so don't need full stops
- That's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB) edit
- Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting
|+ caption_text
as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}
instead. - Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 20:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as this is a nearly perfect list. Chompy Ace 21:54, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey man im josh edit
Source review: Passed
- Reliable enough for the information being cited
- Consistent date formatting
- Consistent and proper reference formatting
- Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
- Spot checks on 20 sources match what they are being cited for
Feedback:
- Ref 4 – Add
|location=Sydneyto differentiate between The Daily Telegraph and The Daily Telegraph (Sydney) at a glance - Ref 22 – Missing date of December 11, 2016 (currently the access date uses this date as well, possibly mistakenly so)
- Ref 21 – Missing date of January 5, 2017
- Ref 26 – Missing date of January 10, 2017
- Ref 37 – Replace The Houston Chronicle with Houston Chronicle
- Ref 46 – Missing date of January 28, 2017
- Ref 47 – Missing date of February 2, 2017
- Ref 52 – Missing date of February 11, 2017
That's what I've got. Ping me when you reply please. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hey man im josh. Thank you for catching those, I'm surprised I missed that many. All done. Sgubaldo (talk) 16:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:36, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Image review – The two lead images have free licensing and alt text, along with an appropriate caption. No issues in this respect. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 18:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.