Premature resetting of sandbox edit

I'm trying to do some testing but you keep resetting it. Can you explain why? Ergzay (talk) 10:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have clear the sandbox Rahio1234 10:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes I understand that, can you more clearly explain why? And why did you go to my talk page and give that message on "constructive editing" for a page that is a test page? Ergzay (talk) 10:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Do you understand the purpose of the sandbox? Ergzay (talk) 10:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I resetting the sandbox Rahio1234 10:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm going to choose to ignore you as you can't seem to communicate clearly in English. Ergzay (talk) 10:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I think i have reset this sandbox Rahio1234 10:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
The sandbox does not need your help. Your edits are disruptive to people who are trying to use the sandbox for the exact reason it exists. Please stop manually resetting unless someone posts obviously disruptive material. --Onorem (talk) 13:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Did you says me Rapid resetting sandbox? Rahio1234 14:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
That's not exactly what I said, but yes. You are reverting other user's legitimate test edits in exactly the place we ask people to make test edits. There is absolutely no need for you to reset the sandbox unless there are WP:BLP violations or other cases of super blatant vandalism or disruptive editing. A bot will take care of it. Please just stop. --Onorem (talk) 14:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024 edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Wikipedia:Sandbox, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I'm just placing this warning for you as you need to stop doing what you've been doing on Wikipedia:Sandbox. This type of repeated instantaneous reverts when people are trying to use the sandbox that you've been doing to other people is not allowed. Ergzay (talk) 04:17, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Ergzay The sandboxs may be reset by users and bots. I recommended use your own sandbox. Rahio1234 07:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Rahio1234 Yes, but intentionally "trolling" by repeatedly resetting a sandbox when it was in the middle of use is a form of disruptive editing. Do not continue to do so. You cannot revert someone's changes to sandbox and then try to claim they're "edit warring" when they continue to try to use it. You do not "own" the sandbox. Stop trying to claim ownership of it. Ergzay (talk) 10:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Rahio1234 reported by User:Ergzay (Result: ). Thank you. Ergzay (talk) 11:06, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Using {{One source}} and {{More citations needed}} templates in Twinkle on stub pages edit

Hi Rahio1234, I reverted several of your changes on several stub pages where you added citation templates. As the instructions on {{one source}} state:

Citing only one source is not a violation of any policy.  Consider not adding this tag to stubs, articles that are being actively expanded, or articles that have no apparent problems with verifiability and neutrality.

I would suggest that you not add those templates to stub pages that don't seem to have obvious issues with their verifiability or neutrality. Those pages need to be expanded, not have additional sources added for their already slim content. Ergzay (talk) 15:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Harrassment edit

  Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's harassment policy, as you did at User:Ergzay, you may be blocked from editing. Your recent edits [1] [2] on my user page, blanking it and then reverting it are harrasment. Do not do that. Ergzay (talk) 16:37, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Ergzay (talk) 17:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply