This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Gelasian Decree is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
This article needs a more careful explanation of the complicated history of the so-called Decretum Gelasianum— by an editor who has profited by reading the External link, for a start. --Wetman 30 June 2005 02:25 (UTC)
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This was sent to the Wikipedia helpdesk email address; could someone more knowledgeable please verify this? Mindspillage(spill yours?) 2 July 2005 02:49 (UTC)
In the hyperlink below Decretum Gelasianum,
http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/decretum.html what follows the words
"III. Item dictum est:" is a forgery. And it can be verified beyond
absolutely any doubt by noticing that dates do not coincide. It says
that it authorizes to read the documents of the synod of Ephesus, but
this was in the year 431, so it is impossible that it can be referred to
by a synod that took place in 382. The same happens with the synod of
Chalcedon which took place en 451! And many inconsistencies like this
can be found. This is mortal to any service of information and it kills
the credibility of institutions, so it must be corrected as soon as
possible.
No action It appears the original poster was claiming that Decretum Gelasianum is a forgery rather than expressing any concerns with our article. Thus this is WP:OR. Daask (talk) 22:32, 28 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
What does “not to be received” mean? 67.86.52.92 (talk) 01:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
It means that Christians should regard it as Scripture or read it aloud in church, sometimes even that they shouldn't read it at all, though that isn't always part of the meaning. Str1977(talk) 20:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply