Wikipedia:WikiProject Pennsylvania/Assessment
Pennsylvania articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
FA | 2 | 8 | 43 | 44 | 97 | ||
FL | 4 | 9 | 11 | 24 | |||
A | 5 | 5 | |||||
GA | 2 | 21 | 91 | 334 | 1 | 449 | |
B | 13 | 185 | 739 | 905 | 27 | 1,869 | |
C | 8 | 168 | 671 | 3,633 | 54 | 4,534 | |
Start | 11 | 65 | 3,309 | 21,451 | 1 | 80 | 24,917 |
Stub | 1 | 82 | 6,136 | 1 | 55 | 6,275 | |
List | 16 | 83 | 490 | 9 | 12 | 610 | |
Category | 1 | 2 | 6,606 | 6,609 | |||
Disambig | 2 | 262 | 264 | ||||
File | 354 | 354 | |||||
Portal | 99 | 99 | |||||
Project | 2 | 34 | 36 | ||||
Redirect | 2 | 35 | 652 | 1,139 | 1,828 | ||
Template | 1 | 1 | 680 | 682 | |||
NA | 3 | 3 | |||||
Other | 41 | 41 | |||||
Assessed | 36 | 471 | 5,068 | 33,663 | 9,229 | 229 | 48,696 |
Unassessed | 1 | 2 | 1 | 233 | 237 | ||
Total | 36 | 471 | 5,069 | 33,665 | 9,230 | 462 | 48,933 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 186,875 | Ω = 4.90 |
Welcome to the assessment department of the WikiProject Pennsylvania! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Pennsylvania articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Pennsylvania}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Pennsylvania articles by quality, Category:Pennsylvania articles by importance, Category:Pennsylvania articles needing attention, Category:Pennsylvania past collaborations, and Category:Pennsylvania past selected articles. The quality and importance ratings serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist. There is also Category:Non-article Pennsylvania pages) for things like redirect pages, templates, categories, images, etc.
Current article status edit
FA | A | GA | B | C | Start | Stub | FL | List | Category | Disambig | Draft | File | Portal | Project | Redirect | Template | NA | ??? | Total |
97 | 5 | 449 | 1,869 | 4,534 | 24,917 | 6,274 | 24 | 610 | 6,609 | 264 | 42 | 354 | 99 | 36 | 1,828 | 682 | 22 | 237 | 48,952 |
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total |
36 | 471 | 5,071 | 33,670 | 9,243 | 462 | 48,953 |
Frequently asked questions edit
- How can I get my article rated?
- As a member of the WikiProject Pennsylvania, you can do it yourself. If you're unsure, list it in the requesting an assessment section below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of WikiProject Pennsylvania is free to add—or change—the rating of an article, but please follow the guidelines.
- Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- Where can I get more comments about my article?
- Contact Wikipedia:WikiProject Pennsylvania who will handle it or assign the issue to someone. You may also list it for a Peer review.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- Relist it as a request or contact Wikipedia:WikiProject Pennsylvania who will handle it or assign the issue to someone.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department, or to contact the Wikipedia:WikiProject Pennsylvania directly.
Instructions edit
An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Pennsylvania}} project banner on its talk page. You can learn the syntax by looking at the talk pages in edit mode and by reading the info below.
This is the rating syntax (ratings and dates are samples, change to what applies to the article in question):
- {{WikiProject Pennsylvania}}
- displays the default banner, showing the project info and only ??? for the quality and importance parameters.
- {{WikiProject Pennsylvania|class=FA|importance=Top}}
- all assessed articles should have quality and importance filled in. Leaving the other parameters off does not hurt anything.
- {{WikiProject Pennsylvania|class=Start|importance=Mid|attention=yes}}
- if an article needs immediate attention, add the attention tag and please leave talk notes as to why. "yes" is the only valid parameter here. If it doesn't need attention, leave the parameter off.
- {{WikiProject Pennsylvania|class=B|importance=High|attention=yes|past-selected=[[July]] [[2006]]|past-collaboration=[[April]] [[2006]]}}
- if an article has been the SATM or COTM, these tags get added in this format. This is the actual project tag of Philmont Scout Ranch.
The following values may be used for the class parameter:
- FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class Pennsylvania articles)
- FL (adds articles to Category:FL-Class Pennsylvania articles)
- A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Pennsylvania articles)
- GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class Pennsylvania articles)
- B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Pennsylvania articles)
- List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Pennsylvania articles)
- Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Pennsylvania articles)
- Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Pennsylvania articles)
- NA (for pages, such as templates or disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:Non-article Pennsylvania pages). This means "non-article", NOT non-applicalbe.
Articles for which a valid class and/or importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Pennsylvania articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.
The following values may be used for the importance parameter:
- Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Pennsylvania articles)
- High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Pennsylvania articles)
- Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Pennsylvania articles)
- Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Pennsylvania articles)
The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.
Quality scale edit
Note: A B-class article should have at least one reference.
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
Importance scale edit
The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of military history. Importance does not equate to quality; a featured article could rate 'mid' on importance.
Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated. Rate international region/country-specific articles from the prespective of someone from that region.
Label | Criteria | Examples |
---|---|---|
Top | Subject is a "core" or "key" topic for Pennsylvania, or is generally notable to people other than students of Pennsylvania. They define and determine the subject of the Pennsylvania WikiProject. | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
High | Subject is notable in a significant and important way within the field of Pennsylvania, but not necessarily outside it. | Johnstown Flood |
Mid | Subject contributes to the total subject of the Pennsylvania WikiProject. Subject may not necessarily be famous. | Johnstown Inclined Plane |
Low | Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within the field of Pennsylvania, and may have been included primarily to achieve comprehensive coverage of another topic. | Wawa Food Markets |
Requesting an assessment or re-assessment edit
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the peer review department instead.
- Add articles here! Newest requests on the BOTTOM
- Like this (and put "(re-)assessment request" in your edit summary of this assessment page), leave reasons if a reassessment.
- New Beaver Field: Made a lot of changes to the page would love to see if it is out of stub yet. NoahRiffe (talk) 19:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Assessment Log edit
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.
May 28, 2024 edit
Renamed edit
Assessed edit
- Herman Isacks op den Graeff (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Template:Indiana University of Pennsylvania (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Robert Perew (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- We the Gathered (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
May 27, 2024 edit
Reassessed edit
- Bolingbroke Mansion (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Conor Lamb (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Mason Black (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed edit
- Category:Category-Class Pennsylvania State University articles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Category-Class University of Pennsylvania articles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Disambig-Class Pennsylvania State University articles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Joseph Mattioli (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Pennsylvania Interscholastic Marching Band Association (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Stub-Class Pennsylvania State University articles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Stub-Class University of Pennsylvania articles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Template-Class Pennsylvania State University articles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Template-Class University of Pennsylvania articles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
Removed edit
- Draft:Todd Cenci (talk) removed.
- WTSD-CD (talk) removed.
May 26, 2024 edit
Reassessed edit
- Albeth Ice Palace (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Allegheny County Mortuary (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Allegheny Mountain Collegiate Conference (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Altonah, Pennsylvania (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- American Pharmacists Association (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Andy Talley (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Atlantic Hockey America (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Auto Race (ride) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Jacob Rinehart (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- USS Wisconsin (BB-64) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from FA-Class to Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
- WQVC-CD (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- WSCP-LP (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- William Bell Waddell (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- William High (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed edit
- 1967 Philadelphia mayoral election (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Pittsburgh Panthers seasons (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
May 25, 2024 edit
Reassessed edit
- 2020 Villanova Wildcats football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2021 Robert Morris Colonials football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2022 Lehigh Mountain Hawks football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- 2022 Philadelphia Stars season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023–24 Penn State Nittany Lions men's ice hockey season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- 2024 Lehigh Mountain Hawks football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Al Lachowicz (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Al Mamaux (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Alberta Ramage Neely (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Eagles Postgame Live (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed edit
- J. Mahlon Barnes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed edit
- List of Philadelphia Union broadcasters (talk) removed.
May 24, 2024 edit
Assessed edit
- Finnegan Foundation (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- George Sheldon (writer) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Lower Anthracite Transportation System (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Lucky Lux (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Rob Bresnahan, Jr. (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
May 23, 2024 edit
Renamed edit
- Draft:Shop-Vac renamed to Shop-Vac.
Reassessed edit
- 2023–24 Philadelphia 76ers season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Eagles Postgame Live (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed edit
- Category:2024 Little League World Series (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Marsha Reines Perelman (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
May 22, 2024 edit
Renamed edit
- Journey Bank Ballpark at Historic Bowman Field renamed to Bowman Field.
- Kings Gap Environmental Education renamed to Kings Gap Environmental Education Center.
Reassessed edit
- 1864 United States presidential election in Pennsylvania (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from List-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
- 1970–71 Pittsburgh Condors season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1972 Franklin & Marshall Diplomats football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1972 Pittsburgh Pirates season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1973 Philadelphia Phillies season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1974 Franklin & Marshall Diplomats football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1974 Penn Quakers football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1974 Philadelphia Phillies season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1976 Penn Quakers football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1978 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1978 Penn Quakers football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1978 Philadelphia Phillies season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1985 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1986 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1987 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1988 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1989 Penn Quakers football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1990 Penn Quakers football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1991 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1992 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1993 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1993 Pittsburgh Pirates season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1994 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1995 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1996 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1997 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1998 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1998 Penn Quakers football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 1999 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2000 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2001 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2003 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2004 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2005 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2006 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2007 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2008 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2009 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2014 Penn Quakers football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2014 Pennsylvania House of Representatives election (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2014 Pittsburgh Riverhounds season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2016 Pennsylvania House of Representatives election (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2017 Shippensburg Raiders football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2019 Pittsburgh Panthers men's soccer team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2019–20 Robert Morris Colonials men's ice hockey season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2020 Bucknell Bison football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- 2020 Lafayette Leopards football team (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Goose Pond Scout Reservation (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed edit
- Bowman Field (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Kings Gap Environmental Education Center (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- Nida Sinnokrot (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Sun Valley High School (Pennsylvania) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Waynesboro Historical Society (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)