Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 21:39, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


Ok Got it, thanks :)! SouthAsianGuy891 (talk) 09:09, 13 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Millennials, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 19:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Betty Logan oh all right, I am done with that article, but thanks for the information and best wishes to you, take care. SouthAsianGuy891 (talk) 19:54, 4 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BNP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

It w as nice time

edit

I made one mistake with an old account so got banned, I accepted it and made a new account after time time and went by every rue, there was disruptive edit by me, but yet got banned just because because I got banned before and you do not give a second chance. WE I DID NOT VIOLATE RULE WITH MY NEW ACCOUNTS AND WIKIPEDIA DOES NOT FORBID MULTIPLE ACCOUNT UNLESS THEY ARE USED ABUSIVELY AND THERE IS NO RECORD OF ME USING ACCOUNTS TO MAKE ANY ABUSIVE Edits. The problem is Wikipedia is filled with biased idiots, the article Millennials is a roof of it , as "The article seems entirely based on selective hate speeches regarding millennial. Any positive remarks of millennial are removed and only selective negative information are included , most of which are not factual but based on predictions. Also any user adding pictures of prominent millienals is shouted off by particular users who act like article owners, saying we are not allowed to add pictures, but the articles Generation X and Baby Boomers do allow pictures. The pictures on the article are ambiguous, claiming them to be millennial is original research. Yet if we add celebrity pictures of known millennial celebrities they say we are not allowed to. This article seems nothing but a hate friction, with useful information, totally violating NPOV and its sole goal is to make Millennial look inferior to Generation X based on what some "heroic Generation X users wants included and does not want to be included. Just check the revision history and the talk page [[1]] . Maybe I can do no better to improve it, but the why this article currently is, it is no more than a millennial hate fiction." Also Bbb23 is a biased admin he lets people with multiple account he likes get away and only targets specific users he dislikes. Maybe I did wrong to make accounts after my original got banned, but I stuck by rules and the only reason the other accounts got banned was because of my original, you do not give me a second chance but allow the worst quality and shittiest mythical articles here. No wonder people find Wikipedia unreliable and even today never uses it for any source or references, the article Millennials which again is a bull shit hate fiction is a roof of what garbage this place is and to everyone who reads the garbage articles know they are garbage, because this site has become a lace solely for garbage users identical to their biased hypocritical contents. Delete this if you feel like, thats all you hypocrites can do, hide truth and give false information. But know that Wikipedia will not just lose all valid writers but all valid readers too. Bye.... SouthAsianGuy891 (talk) 16:03, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply