Welcome to WikiProject Amusement Parks edit

Hello RyanAl6,

I see that you joined WikiProject Amusement Parks via the Participants page! I wanted to personally welcome you! I saw that you checked a tick on the Universal Parks task force. If you are seeking out additional resources, I recommend checking out the Task Force page, or check out the Wikipedia Library (namely Newspapers.com or ProQuest) which may aid in research if you are thinking about improving one of our many articles. If you have any questions or concerns, drop a post on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks where we'd be happy to help assist you. Again, welcome to the WikiProject! :)

All the best. Adog (TalkCont) 03:53, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the welcome. As a universal fan I’ve already been working on various related pages before even realizing there was a specific task force for this. I’ll check out the to do list. RyanAl6 (talk) 13:13, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Ivy League Coats of Arms of.jpeg listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ivy League Coats of Arms of.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. funplussmart (talk) 23:20, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Club Wyndham Bonnet Creek edit

  Hello, RyanAl6. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Club Wyndham Bonnet Creek, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Club Wyndham Bonnet Creek edit

 

Hello, RyanAl6. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Club Wyndham Bonnet Creek".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:47, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Disney adjacent properties edit

I wanted to draw your attention to this:

Bonnet Creek Resort is a 70-acre (28 ha) development in the southeast corner of Walt Disney World. The land, which is not owned by Disney...

Furthermore, while these hotels appear on the Disney map, when you look up the listing of resorts, they do not appear. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 20:06, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

For this. And other edits. English is not my native language, and I do not always understand such features;) — Werter1995 (talk) 18:05, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

No worries man. I'll keep watching the article and make any changes if you need it. RyanAl6 (talk) 21:14, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Source at Inverted roller coaster edit

Just wanted to mention that the source you cited in this edit wouldn't likely pass the reliability test. That page looks like a self-published source to me, which are generally considered unreliable by Wikipedia's standards. The rare exception is when the author/publisher is a subject-matter expert whose work has been published in reliable, independent publications. I couldn't find an "About" page to learn more about the author, so doubtful that's the case here. I recommend replacing that source with a better one. --GoneIn60 (talk) 20:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I see. I pulled the source from the article for the coaster itself, which is already a GA, so I just assumed it was good. I'll see if I can find alternatives for both articles. RyanAl6 (talk) 20:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ah, yes that source does appear to have been in the article back in this 2012 version when it was promoted. Of course, GA reviews aren't too stringent and only involve 1 reviewer, so it might have been overlooked. Also the reviewer in this GA review wasn't too familiar with coasters and their sources to begin with. So yeah, in a nutshell, I wouldn't put too much stock into a GA review, although I completely understand now why you made that assumption. Cheers! -- GoneIn60 (talk) 21:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Found you one that's pretty close. I would cite this one from the Sandusky Register as a complementary source, which confirms most of the same claims and would allow you to keep the other source. The only thing I would be careful of is the way you phrased, "facilitating the inclusion of". Neither source really says that the expanded length of the ride allowed for elements like the cobra roll, although we assume that to be true. Might want to consider dropping that from the text, thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 01:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you much for going through the effort to find that source. I'll add it in and rephrase that sentence. RyanAl6 (talk) 02:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
You are very welcome! THANK YOU as well for helping to improve amusement park related articles! WP:APARKS can always use the extra help! -- GoneIn60 (talk) 02:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
No problem! What can I say – amusement parks are fun to write about. RyanAl6 (talk) 02:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply