Dt128

Contents

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Starlight

Please review the "Source Analysis" table that has just been added to this AfD; it may make you reconsider your !vote. Thanks, Dale 11:29, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Madonna albums discography/archive1

Your concern has been addressed for the FLC of the above article. Please reply with your comments. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:22, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi, can you revisit this FLC to ensure that your comments have been addressed? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 00:52, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

 Done Dt¹²⁸ let's talk 20:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Skunk Anansie discography

Hi!, thanks for your feedback :). I have corrected all the points made with one queried.Marcus Bowen (talk) 17:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Very welcome. I've replied again with a few more comments ;) Dt¹²⁸ let's talk 20:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

No worries :), all resolved now and ready for an oppose or pass :)Marcus Bowen (talk) 23:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

You still have an active oppose at the FLC. When you find time, could you please return there to check whether or not your concerns were addressed? Giants2008 (27 and counting) 03:42, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Request for review

If you have the time, Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Gwen Stefani discography/archive3 needs eyes. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 15:14, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Reviewed. :) Dt¹²⁸ let's talk 17:47, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you :) Dabomb87 (talk) 17:50, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Probably needs a revisit pretty soon. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 16:07, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied ;) Dt¹²⁸ let's talk 22:33, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Another revisit needed. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 03:21, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Done! Sorry, I've not been on as much as usual this week ;) Dt¹²⁸ let's talk 17:17, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Kate Rusby discography/archive1 also needs eyes, when you have the time. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 16:35, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey there, hope you had a great holiday season. Is there anything else this one needs? I'm hoping to close it this weekend. Thanks, and Happy New Year, Dabomb87 (talk) 17:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to discussion.

Dear user. I would like to invite you to the following discussion about the use of Physical and Digital album charts. Discussion here (Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:23, 21 November 2009 (UTC))

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Duffylogo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Duffylogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:58, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Brokenheels.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brokenheels.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:39, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Duffylogo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Duffylogo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 16:13, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Yet another request

Hey there Dt128. I hate to keep leaning on you so much, but there are once again multiple aging discography FLCs that need reviews. If you could review just one of the following three FLCs I would be glad. Here they are (oldest one first):

• Black Eyed Peas discography (FLC)
• Interpol discography (FLC) – Not as needy as the other two
• Pussycat Dolls discography (FLC)

Once again, don't ever feel like you have an obligation to review them. Thanks for all your help, Dabomb87 (talk) 04:59, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

I will! Sorry I've not been active much on Wikipedia lately, but will gladly help with the above over the weekend. Dt¹²⁸ let's talk 21:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Boxvaluesuk

Template:Boxvaluesuk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:02, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Noisettes discography

Just a question, why did you delete the entry for the song "Io Bacio... Tu Baci" from the Nine (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack)? It was a legitimate entry and is properly referenced. Music + Pageants (talk) 06:06, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Beat Again.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beat Again.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:34, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

iamamiwhoami

Hi,

Renaming the section heading to Videos and rewording the introduction was good, but then you stripped out the actual links to the videos. Wouldn't it be better to leave the links so readers can see/hear what they are?

Thank you. --UnicornTapestry (talk) 20:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Frank&backtoblack.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Frank&backtoblack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:I Love You 'Cause I Have To (Please Describe Yourself) -1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:I Love You 'Cause I Have To (Please Describe Yourself) -1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:40, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Re: Request for assessment on Project North East England

Hi, I was just cleaning up the assessment request section on this, and noticed that you had put in a request back in March for Talk:Newcastle United F.C. Did you mean Newcastle United F.C. to be assessed? When I went to check, it's currently showing B/Top assessment. Does it need to be reassessed?

Thanks! - Wmcduff (talk) 02:43, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rockferry Japan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rockferry Japan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Duffydeluxe.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Duffydeluxe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of number-one indie albums of 2009 (UK)

The article List of number-one indie albums of 2009 (UK) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

forgotten page with no sources of archives

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 11:05, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Eoghan Quigg

Template:Eoghan Quigg has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. McGeddon (talk) 13:48, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Crymeout.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crymeout.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about I Am ... Sasha Fierce

Hello, Dt128,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether I Am ... Sasha Fierce should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Am ... Sasha Fierce .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Xevus11 (talk) 23:45, 6 December 2018 (UTC)