Talk:Starbucks

Latest comment: 15 days ago by ChristofferItzakah in topic Boycott amidst the 2023 Israel-Hamas war

American unionization efforts edit

The "American unionization efforts" subheading in the History section should be bolded to match the formatting of the rest of the History section. 96.2.62.251 (talk) 23:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Fake news cited edit

"In December, the companies' value dropped by $11 billion amidst these boycotts"

the three citations cited here are the Economic Times of India, Mint, and BNN - all articles cited do not have any author bylines and they do not cite any sources. They are all anonymous opinion articles.

BNN Breaking is notably a fake news website. https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/bnn-posts-more-false-stories-about-dean-preston-18429261.php 2601:143:8100:13E0:3807:6743:4D98:1790 (talk) 15:58, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 31 January 2024 edit

In the Oleato section of products change "Said it introduced" to "Said it would introduce" StandMixer (talk) 15:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: no reason given for the proposed change. M.Bitton (talk) 16:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 13 April 2024 edit

Change Italy locations number from the wrong current number to 37 which is the correct number updated to today April 13th 2024 (see Starbucks Wikipedia page in italian language for reference) Dezisnotonfire (talk) 18:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Not done for now: The corresponding article in Italian doesn't have a source for there being 37 locations, and I couldn't find one that did. Askarion 20:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Boycott amidst the 2023 Israel-Hamas war edit

"to sue the Starbucks Workers United (SWU) union for making a social media post in solidarity with Palestine" This only mentions the first part of what happened, but not the second. Which consequently gives a totally false impression of why Starbucks sued. The union in question posted a quote tweet that read 'Solidarity with Palestine' - yes that parts true. What context is missing is what they were quote tweeting: An anti-Israel account showing Hamas tearing down the border fence so they could invade Israel and proceed to massacre over 1,000 Israelis. Sentence should be re-worded to provide full context, instead of partial. https://www.ynetnews.com/article/s10bmni116

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/10/19/starbucks-workers-united-lawsuits-hamas-israel-post/71238901007/

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/starbucks-union-championed-by-bernie-sanders-and-aoc-celebrates-hamas-attacks/ ChristofferItzakah (talk) 04:39, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply