Talk:Resorts World Las Vegas

Split from Echelon Place

I think this would be covered better in a single article with Echelon Place. Echelon is and always will be part of the history of Resorts World, and Resorts World will even incorporate most of the structures that were already built for Echelon. I would argue for undoing the split, and perhaps moving the combined article to this title, so as not to appear outdated. Toohool (talk) 21:35, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

I support this idea 100 percent. AJFU (talk) 18:48, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Construction Photo

@Toohool:The siding on the building is consistent with the Wynn buildings, not the Resorts World rendering. SportsFan007 (talk) 03:48, 8 December 2018 (UTC)SportsFan007

That is true; nevertheless, the photo is of Resorts World. Wynn West is nowhere close to even beginning construction. Toohool (talk) 04:10, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Ah ok, thank you!!! SportsFan007 (talk) 05:35, 8 December 2018 (UTC)SportsFan007

Request interior images

Can anyone upload the interior images and the hotel facilities of the resorts?--Wpcpey (talk) 15:42, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Recent changes

@AJFU: Hey, good rearranging of the History section here. I thought a lot of the same stuff should go, but got bogged down to repetition (as you noticed) on the Features part, so I wasn't so brave as you. I had been mimicking other resort pages like Caesars, Virgin, Harrah's, the Westgate... by adding to the concert residencies in the theater. And, sorry, but I thought that the intro leans way too much on what the place was before it even was the thing that the page is named for, especially the first paragraph... 2008 being more than a decade before the place opened, for example. So, a little surprised to see that back. The second paragraph also doesn't seem quite right for the intro either. (I was thinking to remove it from the intro, or replace allegations with the case's resolution.) But, maybe you think it all belongs there, so I'm curious about why. I haven't seen past property incarnations get much more than a mention in the intro on other second-lifer site casino pages, like Virgin, Venetian, Fontainebleau, The Strat, Planet Hollywood, etc. Thanks. Cheers.X CP X (talk) 15:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Every article is different, and that's certainly true for casinos. Those other second-life properties you mentioned are simple cases where it went from one to another (either through a renovation or a complete rebuild). There's a bit more to it in this case, as the Stardust was demolished for a new project which then got canceled but was re-used for yet another new project. In a case like this, a little extra detail is warranted. With that said, I agree there were unneeded details and have trimmed them.

I also trimmed a bit from the second paragraph. The part about the lawsuit already starts off by noting the resolution (that further design changes were made as a result of the suit).  AJFU  (talk) 00:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)