Talk:Pop (NSYNC song)
Latest comment: 9 months ago by MaterialWorks in topic Requested move 18 July 2023
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pop (NSYNC song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | On 18 July 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Pop (song). The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 18 July 2023 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 16:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
– Revert per WP:SMALLDETAILS. RMXY (talk) 02:06, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose I might normally support it, but in this case it's liable to cause confusion with pop song, so it doesn't really assist with navigation in any way. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:09, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. I don't think small details should apply when the article titles still have to have a parenthetical disambiguator. Small details should only apply as a form of natural disambiguation to avoid the need for a parenthetical disambiguator. Rreagan007 (talk) 07:43, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose 1st per Zxcvbnm point about pop song as well as per SMALLDETAILS which generally only works with a spelling variant not the absence of a variant. Support 2nd as the variant (the addition of the "!") appears to make this one unique. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:33, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose per all above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:38, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support both. The NSYNC song is the only song with an article with the base name Pop, so should carry the standard qualifier per WP:SONGDAB. Pop! (song) is the only song with the base name Pop!, so likewise should be disambiguated as Pop! (song) per WP:SONGDAB. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:19, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- The absence of the "!" doesn't make in unique as its a variant of "Pop" per WP:SMALLDETAILS. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.