Talk:Phintella parva

Phintella parva was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 11, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Spiders Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spiders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spiders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpidersWikipedia:WikiProject SpidersTemplate:WikiProject SpidersSpiders articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Asia: China / Japan / North Korea / South Korea / Russia Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	China portal This article is supported by WikiProject China (assessed as Low-importance).
	Japan portal This article is supported by WikiProject Japan (assessed as Low-importance).
	North Korea portal This article is supported by North Korea working group (assessed as Low-importance).
	South Korea portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Korea (assessed as Low-importance).
	Russia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Russia (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Asia may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 2 days ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Unsuccessful. Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 13:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Phintella parva/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 12:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Wolverine XI (talk · contribs) 10:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I should finish the review today. Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 10:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

However, retrospectively; it was Retrospectively?
between 3.5 and 4 mm (0.14 and 0.16 in) long, and yellow "and yellow" doesn't make much sense
The female is slightly larger than the male. What does this imply?
difference between this species and other members of the genus => feature of this species
Unlink species in Taxonomy
The species name is the Latin for small. Latin for small? or the Latin word for small?
Unlink genus in Taxonomy
but was transferred to Phintella in 1983 => then later transferred to Phintella in 1983
After being transferred to the new genus, the gender of the species name was changed, from parvus to parva Do you mean genus? Sentence is overall confusing
genus Phintella was raised raised?
The genus name derives from the genus Phintia, which it resembles. What?
which was subsequently absorbed into Tylogonus. absorbed?
It has a body is divided into two main parts Huh?
a cephalothorax that has a length of between 1.78 and 2.05 mm (0.070 and 0.081 in) and a width of between 1.28 and 1.55 mm (0.050 and 0.061 in), and an abdomen that is between 2.98 and 3.08 mm (0.117 and 0.121 in) long and 1.8 and 2.18 mm (0.071 and 0.086 in) wide. Very awkwardly phrased?
The spider has a carapace that is longer than it is wide I suggest rephrasing.
It is a yellow with circular markings grammatically incorrect

I'll stop here. What is apparent is that the article needs to be rewritten. The grammar and prose is particularly subpar. I suggest working on the article prose before renominating. Best, Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 13:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic