Talk:PCGG

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Paul Koning in topic Narrow vs. wide FM
WikiProject iconRadio Stations
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This page was added an now extended to add weight to PGCC's entry in the List of the world's oldest radio stations.

Narrow vs. wide FM edit

The article says that what Idzerda invented is narrowband FM, while Armstrong invented wide band FM. Even if true that is a distinction without a difference -- FM is FM, the deviation used is a parameter that can be chosen fairly arbitrarily. In any case, it's not even accurate; the early Armstrong patents speak of "100 percent" modulation with an explanation that translates to a modulation index near 1, which is very definitely narrowband FM. A more accurate description of the two would be that (a) Idzerda's work has been forgotten while Armstrong's became well known and directly led to the current practice, and (b) Armstrong also developed receiver technology that takes advantage of the noise immunity potential of FM, while Idzerda adopted FM for other reasons (efficiency and simplicity of the transmitter) and did not mention or was not aware of the capture effect. Paul Koning (talk) 18:38, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply