This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Central America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Central America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Central AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Central AmericaCentral America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Guatemala, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guatemala on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuatemalaWikipedia:WikiProject GuatemalaTemplate:WikiProject GuatemalaGuatemala articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica articles
Per WP MESO current guidelines, this article should be at Nakbe (without the accent, not required in cases where name originates from Mayan languages).--cjllw | TALK 03:24, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
The merger of material from Nakbé into Nakbe has been completed.--cjllw | TALK 23:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This is the only place in Wikipedia where "tecomates" seem to appear. Methinks that since tecomate is such a notable Mesoamerican archaeological artefact (found in several sites in Veracruz, Chiapas, and Guatemala), it should have its own article, where it can be properly described and documented. Omnipedian (talk) 04:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sure, tecomate would make a worthy subject for an article, it awaits only some editor with both time and inclination to spring into being. If you feel suitably disposed, pls proceed! --cjllwʘTALK 08:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
