Talk:FIFA Club of the Century
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the FIFA Club of the Century article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 8 September 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Real Madrid C.F.. |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Unsigned notes edit
The link does not work as of this date. elpincha 17:43, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
The ranking edit
According the ranking PDF's archive, this ranking was based for a votes by the FIFA Magazine's readers. For that a club with few international titles like MU was ranked 2nd and other clubs with great honours like Juve or Peñarol after the 5th position. --Dantetheperuvian (talk) 21:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Something is wrong here edit
In the list, Barça appears in the third position, while in the .pdf link you can see Bayern ahead of Barcelona in the third place. Then you have Santos ahead of Ajax and in the page you see Ajax before Santos. Am I missing something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.21.34.13 (talk) 05:26, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Intro needed edit
This article needs a better intro to explain what these rankings represent. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 02:09, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 March 2016 edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Botafogo is mentioned two times in the list. AlexanderSanz (talk) 03:22, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on FIFA Club of the Century. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110807051427/http://www.fifa.com/classicfootball/stadiums/stadium=456/detail.html to http://www.fifa.com/classicfootball/stadiums/stadium=456/detail.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050120112217/http://www.rte.ie:80/sport/2000/1212/zidanez.html to http://www.rte.ie/sport/2000/1212/zidanez.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:30, 28 December 2016 (UTC)