Talk:FAA Order 8110.37

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 25 October 2022 by reviewer Onel5969 (talk · contribs).

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Curation tag edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

@Onel5969:

1) It is a stub.

2) I now appreciate the concern for secondary sources on stubs.

3) re. Order 8110.37; non-trivial, reliable, independent sources will be easy for me to scare up with sufficient time.

4) There is a presumption that the DER system is notable, it is the frontline on safe airspace; a hot area has been drone developers exclaiming 81-what? Yes, there is a stub DER paragraph.

5) The tags convey a sense of urgency. WP is Patient applies? May I have three weeks?

6) I would appreciate feedback on the secondary sources I have invested in CAST-15; it has been interesting to see the pattern of DO-178C discussions stepping aside into CAST-15 when then they get to the still inadequate DO-178C sections.

IveGoneAway (talk) 22:11, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi IveGoneAway - the tags are there to encourage anyone to help develop the article. Not until (or even if) it gets nominated for deletion (either through AfD or Prod), there is no rush. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the clarification, Onel5969. Even so, the wording of the notability tag suggests otherwise.

IveGoneAway (talk) 22:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I discussed this somewhat with a DER last week, noting that while software is but one of dozens of delegated functions, the effort of the software delegated function is massive compared to other functions.

I might not be able to addresss this for 5-6 weeks, but I have a way forward for secondary sources.

IveGoneAway (talk) 14:53, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

FAA Form 8110-3 / FAA Order 8130.24 edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The 8110-3 is particularly critical to the applicant; "gold" one might say.

I am just now looking into the importance of 8130.24, (e.g., Steenholdt v. F.A.A. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit).

I really think these warrant mention, having myself searched the wiki for 8110-2, but not their own stub pages.

IveGoneAway (talk) 15:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

FAA Order 8130.24 seems withdrawn. Is there a replacement?

IveGoneAway (talk) 21:46, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic