The contents of the Claret page were merged into Bordeaux wine on 20 July 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wine, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.WineWikipedia:WikiProject WineTemplate:WikiProject WineWine articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Since Claret is just a British name for Bordeaux Wine, it ought to redirect to this page. At present, someone searching for 'Claret' would be led to think that we only have very sparse information on that topic. The information on the Claret page should be added here, or to history of Bordeaux wine as appropriate.
Havelock Jones (talk) 12:03, 24 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The section on viticulture and winemaking is currently disproportionately long, and I suggest that it contains much more detailed information on these topics than the casual reader will typically want. Therefore I propose that it be splintered into its own article and replaced with a summary.
Havelock Jones (talk) 09:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The bulk of the text is over a decade old, and the urls are being replaced en masse with links to the Web Archive. If anybody has the knowledge and inclination to re-write the entire page, I'm sure it would be welcomed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:7117:900:F808:1E4C:34CF:2C47 (talk) 20:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
