Talk:Bald Hills Radiator

Latest comment: 5 years ago by ChocolateTrain in topic Quality assessment:

Quality assessment: edit

Comments edit

The article best fits the C-Class criteria descriptors that can be found here. It is of substantial length, and is written fairly well. There are places where more attention to WP:NPOV should be paid, however, and there is a lot of technical information which could be summarised a little better. Some more work on paragraphing and sentence structure wouldn't hurt, but it is certainly not poor. More references should also be found if possible. Perhaps an image would be good in the description section as well. ChocolateTrain (talk) 15:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

B-Class criteria edit

Currently, this is how the article stacks up against the B-Class criteria. These criteria can again be found at the link provided above.

  • B1   Not done
  • B2   Done
  • B3   Done
  • B4   Not done
  • B5   Not done
  • B6   Done