Welcome to my talk page!

To get my attention at a discussion page, you can ping me there. Just include {{Replyto|SilverLocust}} in a comment or include [[User:SilverLocust]] in a comment or edit summary.

If you would like to send me a message that is not permanently etched into this page's edit history, you can instead send it by email or leave a message on my alternative talk page.


Tech News: 2024-22 edit

MediaWiki message delivery 00:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Engineer's Building airstrike edit

This is a straightforward supervote, and if you do not reverse it I will be opening a move review. nableezy - 13:01, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Obviously I don't believe it was a supervote or I wouldn't have done the close. Open a move review if you believe that would be productive. SilverLocust 💬 18:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Please see the initiated move review. nableezy - 21:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics edit

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 21:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I am certainly aware of that. While I don't edit articles in the topic area very much, I have created more than 500 editnotices with {{ArbCom Arab-Israeli editnotice}} to remind others of the restrictions. SilverLocust 💬 22:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Gianna "Gigi" Bryant edit

In the future, in cases like that where the existing redirect used to be an article with substantial edit history, it's better to move it to the "Administrator Needed" section and request that a WP:HISTMERGE be done rather than swapping the pages. I went ahead and swapped the talk pages back and did a manual merge of their contents, and tagged the article for an admin to do a history merge. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
21:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Ahecht: After I had a histmerge declined because there wasn't copying, I've only requested them for C&P moves. I didn't see any copying or attribution issues, so I just swapped them. By the way, you have some pages left in Special:PrefixIndex/Draft talk:Move/ space. SilverLocust 💬 22:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the heads up. I was beta testing the next version of my swapping tool and one of my failed attempts must've dropped those. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
13:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2024-23 edit

MediaWiki message delivery 22:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply