List of Wii games edit

Hey there Geekrecon,

I've noted that you've contributed before to the List of Wii games. Just wanted to let you know that the list is getting ready for Featured status and is currently undergoing a Peer Review. If you can take a moment to look over the article and add your suggestions/comments for improvement here, it'd be much appreciated. Thanks! -Digiwrld1 21:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hullbreach on Wii homebrew edit

Hi Geekrecon,

I just wanted to let you know why I reverted your changes to the Wii homebrew article. As cool as your Hullbreach project may be, it is not related to the efforts to improve Homebrew capabilities for the Wii. It is merely an example of a game that takes advantage of the technologies that have been developed. However, should your game become notable at some point in the future, you can consider creating a separate article for it.

If you have any questions, feel free to post a comment on my Talk Page. Happy Wikipedianing! Jbanes 21:07, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hullbreach edit

A tag has been placed on Hullbreach, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 59.167.38.62 06:03, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wii opera sdk edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Wii opera sdk, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://wiki.hullbreachonline.com/index.php?title=Wii_Opera_SDK&redirect=no. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:49, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I originally wrote that article for the HullBreach Online wiki and used it as a starting point before considerably editing, citing, and updating the Wikipedia article. Geekrecon (talk) 19:00, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Breakdance Crew edit

 

The article Breakdance Crew has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BAND and WP:GNG, little to no reliable source coverage that I could find to back up statements in article, so fails WP:V as well

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Everymorning (talk) 13:54, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Texturedshield.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Texturedshield.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. czar 04:25, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Starfoxclonesdkdemo.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Starfoxclonesdkdemo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. czar 04:25, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Hullbreachonlinesdkdemo.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Hullbreachonlinesdkdemo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. czar 04:26, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:WiiOperaSdkLogo.png listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WiiOperaSdkLogo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 15:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Raycastingmenu.jpg edit

 

The file File:Raycastingmenu.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file with no clear usability on project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:11, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:WiiOperaSdkLogo.jpg edit

 

The file File:WiiOperaSdkLogo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 07:36, 5 January 2019 (UTC)Reply