Talk:The Last of Us: Left Behind
The Last of Us: Left Behind has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
The Last of Us: Left Behind is part of the The Last of Us series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 5, 2015. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that The Last of Us: Left Behind featured entire gameplay encounters involving water guns, and a photo booth? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can I just change it to GA? edit
I don't know know much about this. I also don't know whether I am allowed to just change it or if I need to do anything else (when changing a "Start" to a "C" you just make the one edit on the talk page). The reason I say this in the first place is because they say that "GA" and "Featured Articles" are strict. To me it is clearly a "Good Article". —DangerousJXD (talk) 03:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- I appreciate your kind words about the article, DangerousJXD, and for approaching the talk page first. In order to promote this to GA, you'll need to conduct a review to ensure that the article meets the appropriate good article criteria. For more assistance, you should read the Reviewing instructions. Thanks! -- Rhain1999 (talk to me) 06:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Since my post above, I have come to understand how the process works (just thought I'd say that). Why has nobody started it yet? —DangerousJXD (talk) 21:31, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- DangerousJXD, it can often take a long time for someone to start reviewing a GAN; there are still quite a few GA nominees that are yet to be reviewed (as can be seen here). Just so you know, I believe you are eligible to review this article, as you have only made two minor edits to the article so far, but I understand if you wish to avoid doing as such. -- Rhain1999 (talk to me) 00:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Since my post above, I have come to understand how the process works (just thought I'd say that). Why has nobody started it yet? —DangerousJXD (talk) 21:31, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
GA Review edit
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Last of Us: Left Behind/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: GamerPro64 (talk · contribs)
Gonna stake my claim on reviewing this article. Feedback coming soon. GamerPro64 22:34, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Review edit
-Throughout the game, players control Ellie; Riley is controlled by the artificial intelligence.[3] I checked its citation and I didn't see that mentioned in it.
-There, she treats his open wound, and takes Joel away from the mall to find a hideout for the coming Winter. I'm not sure if "There" should be in the sentence. -A random question since I've never played The Last of Us. Does the game just ends with Ellie and Riley embracing each other? Just a weird way to end the plot overall. GamerPro64 21:41, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
-I think you should look at the archived sources to your citations. I was checking the GameSpot review and I think it sent me to a clip from Eddie Murphy's "Raw" comedy special. [1]. GamerPro64 19:31, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
So besides the archive links issue, which doesn't effect GA criteria, I believe this article meets requirements to become a Good Article. If you do not agree with this decision, you can take the article to WP:GAR for reassessment. Cheers. GamerPro64 01:05, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
|
Why are only leftist critics cited? edit
I am curious why only far-left sources are cited in the article. This article contains no conservative sources criticizing the game for its blatant promotion of the homosexual agenda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grubsboer (talk • contribs) 12:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
- No such reliable source exists. – Rhain ☔ 13:19, 25 January 2020 (UTC)