This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
This article has been, and will be, subject to various vandalisms from 4chan users. This includes any references to "digits," "repeating digits," "doubles," "bateman," etc. I recommend semi-protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.109.140.189 (talk) 01:49, 29 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
I don't see any evidence of it. Drmies (talk) 15:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
What you see, if you look at the article history, is a pattern of vandalism on this relatively obscure article, starting on 21 January. I have no idea whether it has anything to do with 4chan or not, but it's still vandalism. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
For other editors' benefit - the vandalism seems to have occurred again, hopefully a one-off. It's to do with this meme, the idea being that it's funny to add the words "Check 'Em" into an article about "Dubs". No, I don't understand it either, but I guess it must be amusing if you're of a certain age and intellectual level. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:22, 7 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
@RCStarter: The source you assert to be reliable does not support the claim being made; the other sources provided are not reliable per WP:RSP. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
