Untitled

edit

If the Coasters had a hit on "Love Potion No. 9" in 1971, The Clovers had it as a hit in 1959. It could pass for a Coasters song (it's a Leiber-Stoller song, for one thing), but the Clovers also had lots of "story" songs, including "One Mint Julep". "Love Potion No. 9" was the last Clovers hit. Ortolan88 05:25 Jan 2, 2003 (UTC)

"Love Potion No. 9" was written for the Coasters. Leiber & Stoller gave it to the Clovers instead at the behest of their old friend, Clovers manager and United Artists label head Lou Krefetz. Pstoller (talk) 02:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Doo Wop!(Interrobang)?

edit

The Coasters aren't a doo wop group. They are a rhythm and blues quartet, like the Clovers and Drifters. Doo wop doesn't encompass every singing group from the 50s, only some of them. Can anyone defend this characterization? Ortolan88 04:17, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Rhythym and Blues encompassed groups like The Five Keys, The Ink Spots, and The Ravens. R&B songs are slow, and don't have a bass lead-in (this was the thing that originally separated doo wop from R&B). Early doo wop was mostly slow, similar to R&B, and the up-tempo songs, like those done by The Coasters, didn't come around until the mid 1950s. Typically, then, the uptempo songs from this era are considered doo wop. JeremyMcCracken 16:24, 14 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Neither Carl Gardner nor Leiber & Stoller considered the Coasters a doo-wop group. Rhythm and Blues encompasses many styles from ballads to uptempo numbers; it's probably the best label for the Coasters' music. One might also call the Coasters a rock & roll vocal group, although they were not conceived as such. Doo-wop was characterized by a lead singer carrying the lyrics and melody over a backing group that would sing nonsense syllables; hence the name of the genre. With a couple of rare early exceptions, this was not what the Coasters did. A counter-argument would be that the Coasters are in the Doo-Wopp Hall of Fame, although it was Leon Hughes' group, not Carl Gardner's, that appeared at the induction ceremony. Pstoller (talk) 02:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Citations & References

edit

See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags Nhl4hamilton (talk) 04:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Coasters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Coasters" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Coasters and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 19#Coasters until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 03:21, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply