Picture request

edit

She is so beautiful that it's a shame that no picture is included in the article

YEAH!
On another note, can somebody straighten this out? I've heard she entered the Elite contest & lost... Trekphiler 20:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
You're right -- she didn't win. I think Steph ended up being such a successful model that a lot of people just assume she must've won (I could swear I read once that she placed fourth or fifth, but I can't find an online source for that). A little trivia: Cindy Crawford was also in the 1983 contest, and didn't win either! JilliJ (talk) 04:13, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

1968 or 1969?

edit

Did she born in 1968 or 1969? 114.25.248.230 (talk) 11:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

or even 1967. I remember her year of birth being listed as 1967.173.60.152.5 (talk) 18:09, 18 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Usually listed as 1968. Now it is 1969 in the article, but I'm wondering if the source fashionmodeldirectory really is a reliable source? I would say IMDB is more reliable, but haven't been visiting the model site in ages. 85.217.45.181 (talk) 08:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Son sex topic

edit

Do we feel this should be included in the article? Is it not rumor and gossip? --BwB (talk) 14:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Removed gossip. --BwB (talk) 09:02, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think this is worth mentioning. It's been covered extensively in the news and there is photographic evidence of them kissing. Examples:

Perhaps a sub-section under personal life titled "beach controversy with son"? Ranze (talk) 20:30, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Religion?

edit

Judaism? Conversion to judaism from marriage? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.92.113.139 (talk) 02:29, 28 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

what a train wreck ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.184.250.10 (talk) 14:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Stephanie Seymour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Can a 16 year old living with a 42 year old really be called dating?

edit

The characterization of this relationship seems to endorse one which is, at the very least, potentially illegal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:F90:6950:1CD2:435E:F3ED:32DD (talk) 17:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Midastouch is claiming she married him @ 15? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PT5vctbicd4 61.69.251.145 (talk) 04:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply