Talk:Rule of Three (Wicca)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Misty MH in topic Correct interpretation?

Anthroposophy

edit

Being as this is an article on 'Rule of Three (Wicca)', specifically, I would propose that the section titled "Anthroposophy" does not belong here and should be removed. It is not relevant Rule of Three (Wicca) and this is not a space for comparison of supposedly similar principles in other works, philosophies, and religions. This article is specifically for the "rule of three" in Wicca. Being as there is no connection between the article's subject and Anthroposophy, that section should be removed from this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.67.79.87 (talk) 19:49, 10 December 2021 (UTC) ---Article has been adited to remove the "Anthroposophy" section, in line with above observation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.67.73.51 (talk) 23:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Correct interpretation?

edit

Where it says "when thou receivest good, so equally art bound to return good threefold" does not seem to say that one will get threefold good return but that one is bound to return/do threefold good. Of course, the English is weird, but this seems to be what it means, not what the article appears to say (skimming). Original author explanation available? Misty MH (talk) 05:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply