Talk:Rothamsted Research

Controversies

edit

It seems strange that there is no mention of Rothamsted Research's role in testing genetically modified wheat, and the protests that have greeted that, as described by The Guardian. As it stands, the article is little more than a public relations flyer for the institute, and hardly qualifies as following the Wikipedia policy of a neutral point of view. Skinsmoke (talk) 03:59, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

I've now added a section on the protest. Rothamsted was not involved in the first round of GM trials and I'm not aware of any other controversies.--Salix (talk): 08:09, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for that incredibly quick response. Skinsmoke (talk) 01:52, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Rothamsted Research. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply