This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Support for the statement "Wilke was an excellent golfer." seems weak. The bases for that evaluation are: 1) a golf club pro saying, "A solid four handicap, but his putting is deteriorating. Wilke must have won more celebrity tournaments than you can count." and 2) "James Garner also said that Wilke was the best golfer among the showbiz crowd at the Riviera."
I am no golf expert, but I wonder whether having a four handicap and winning celebrity tournaments makes a person an excellent golfer. I also wonder whether being "the best golfer among the showbiz crowd at the Riviera" is sufficient to classify a person as an excellent golfer. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
After posting the comment above, I found a newspaper article that focuses on Wilke's golfing skill and added it to the article. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:25, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
