Talk:Ophthalmology in the medieval Islamic world

Latest comment: 11 years ago by 71.91.118.144 in topic Untitled

Untitled

edit

The use of the term medieval in reference to Islam is rather odd, it usually being reserved for discussion of European history. This page could benefit from more precise dating. PaulH 192.174.2.253 03:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

The title is strangely worded in general. This page does not discuss the relationship between the religion of Islam and ophthalmology, it's about ophthalmological innovations originating from Islamic communities. Perhaps, "Ophthalmology in the pre-modern Islamic world," although that's pretty ugly, too. The medieval Islamic medicine page makes similar points, beginning with the disambiguation:

"This article is about historic practice of "rational medicine". For Islam in medicine, see Prophetic medicine."

and later clarifying further,

"Some consider the label "Arab-Islamic" as historically inaccurate, arguing it does not appreciate the rich diversity of scholars who contributed to Islamic science many of whom were neither Arab nor Muslim."

FLH 71.91.118.144 (talk) 18:14, 28 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ibn al-Haytham

edit

Ibn al-Haytham was not an ophthalmologist, his anatomical "contributions" were likely taken from Galen. He may have suggested that the retina was involved in image formation and that vision occurred in the brain, not the eye, but this hardly counts as "ophthalmology". He also thought that the receptive part of the eye was the lens, rather than (as we now know) the retina. Famousdog (talk) 12:22, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Also the source for this is from a complementary medicine journal, for Pete's sake! Famousdog (talk) 12:36, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Stuff

edit

Vast tracts of this are uncited. The "references" section is very poor William M. Connolley (talk) 22:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Persian Zakaria Razi.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Persian Zakaria Razi.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Persian Zakaria Razi.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)Reply