Talk:Merrick Garland
Latest comment: 1 day ago by Red Shogun412 in topic Consider Page Protection
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Merrick Garland article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
Edit Merrick Garland (Supreme Court nomination)
editOriginal (under section: Scalia vacancy and 2016 nomination)
Over 170,000 people signed a White House petition asking President Obama to independently appoint Garland to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Senate had waived its advise and consent role.
New:
Over 170,000 people signed a White House petition, created Nov. 9 2016, one day after the 2016 general elections, asking President Obama to independently appoint Garland to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Senate had waived its advise and consent role.
References
- ^ petitions.obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/petition/appoint-garland-now-senate-has-waived-its-rights
It is now empty.
Consider Page Protection
editSince Garland is currently a hot topic amongst conspiracy theorists and revolutionary cosplayers in the aftermath of the contempt of court vote along party-lines by the house of representatives, it may be worth considering protecting this article from further vandalism.
- I just posted a report to the biography of living persons noticeboard to bring this issue to attention there. Red Shogun412 (talk) 02:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)