Talk:Magahi language

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Mcswell in topic Description

60.242.111.72 05:10, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

This page mentions the number of speakers of this language in three places, and each count is different: 11,362,000; 13 million; and 17,449,446.

Description

edit

The description says "The pronunciation in Magahi is not as broad as in Maithili and there are a number of verbal forms for each person." I have no idea what "broad" is intended to mean in this context, and the number of verbal forms for each person is very vague. The reference cited says "Maithili has a bewildering mass of verbal forms, but only two numbers and two genders, while the verbal form is changed only in the past and future tenses." It's not at all clear from that description what the "bewildering" number of forms is, so I'm tempted to just delete this. But I don't know anything about the language, so for now I won't.

Also, Kachchayano is quoted as saying "'There is a language which is the root (of all languages)... it is Magadhi.'" There are dozens of other languages that have claimed that same status, such as Arabic, Hebrew, Dutch, Phrygian, Tamil (IIRC), and so forth. This is of course nonsense; there is no language extant today that is a candidate for that status, if for no other reason than the fact that all languages change through time. Mcswell (talk) 18:09, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 18:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Magahi language template

edit

If you are a native speaker of Magahi then you can help translate this template into your own language:


magThis user is a native speaker of Magahi.

Edit


--Amazonien (talk) 04:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Count of speakers

edit

Arbitrary number of 17 million and odd was quoted as number of speakers in opening sentence. This has been removed. The number of speakers quoted in Infobox is about 11 million, while the first paragraph ends with an estimate of 13 million.

Hope someone can fix and provide reference to reliable source of information as well. It will also be good to quote the year for such count / estimate. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 07:27, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Magahi Speakers in 2001: 13,978,565; As per Census by Govt. of India: http://censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2001/Census_Data_Online/Language/Statement1.htm So I believe an estimate of roughly 14million for 2001 is fair and decentIndian (talk) 00:20, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Magahi language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:44, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

"Spoken Trends"

edit

This section is of no use to unilingual English speakers without transliteration of the Devanagari script.184.145.42.19 (talk) 04:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Magahi language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 30 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Magahi language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply