Talk:Kings' School, Winchester

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Nominated for cleanup

edit

The article needs wikifying, sources citing and expanding. --Jrothwell (talk) 12:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Former Pupils

edit

I don't understand why former pupils section keeps getting changed, its information that has been correctly referenced. what is the problem?Snesboy (talk) 18:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Former schools

edit

Montgomery of Alamein School (the previous boys school) was comprehensive, not secondary modern. It replaced Romsey Road Secondary Modern School in 1968. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robofw9 (talkcontribs) 00:21, 20 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

School performance data unknown reference date

edit

The data from here used to cite the first sentence of performance figures has been updated automatically many times since it was likely originally referenced (and does not store previous data). Should this claim be updated? Removed?

Also, in the future particular attention needs to be paid to accessdate. Zedrox (talk) 14:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kings' School, Winchester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply