Talk:Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 2600:1700:3BE0:5A60:78C4:18F6:17C3:1449 in topic Highway design, traffic policy

Highway design, traffic policy

edit

One important thing that appears to be missing from the article entirely (other than a brief note that I just added to the intro) is that the IIHS is also involved in highway design and traffic policy issues. See here: http://www.iihs.org/iihs/topics/t/roadway-and-environment/topicoverview. Their history section also lists a few landmark cases where they influenced policy.

For instance, it promoted red light cameras. This is a particularly interesting story because there's the question of whether insurance companies actually benefit from drivers getting more tickets (even though they do benefit from driver safety). This study is somewhat controversial. However designing highways to avoid hazards, I don't see any particular conflict of interest there, but maybe I'm missing it.

Also missing from this article is the fact that IIHS was a staunch supporter of the National Maximum Speed Law (NMSL) while it was in effect, and is to this day an ardent foe of higher speed limits; the IIHS and its researchers have authored many studies aimed at proving that higher limits and the faster driving speeds resulting from them, cause more deaths and injuries on American highways since the NMSL was modified to allow 65 mph limits on rural freeways in 1987 and repealed entirely in 1995. This contradicts the long-term trend of declining traffic deaths and death rates since 1989. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:3BE0:5A60:78C4:18F6:17C3:1449 (talk) 13:09, 12 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:11, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.iihs.org/iihs/news/desktopnews/on-the-right-side-10-midsize-cars-earn-good-ratings-for-passenger-side-protection. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. -- Thanks, Alfie. talk to me | contribs 01:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply