Talk:Here's Lucy

Latest comment: 9 years ago by 74.139.205.249 in topic Cancellation concerns.

Syndication and Rights issues

edit

Is anyone sure about Viacom ever distributing "The Lucy Show" before 1994? I came across a trade ad from a 1973 issue of Broadcasting magazine and it showed a ad for "Mission: Impossible" and "The Lucy Show" and both were distributed by Paramount Television Sales (this was before the 1994 merger between Paramount and Viacom, of course.) Terehend72 (talk) 04:12, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Hereslucylogo.jpg

edit
 

Image:Hereslucylogo.jpg is being used in this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:TVGuideLUCYLIZDICK.jpg

edit
 

Image:TVGuideLUCYLIZDICK.jpg is being used in this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Harrison Carter?

edit

I was looking for another Harrison Carter, but I was redirected here. Amazing to see that this article NEVER cites Harrison Carter... --Fioravante Patrone (talk) 22:41, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply


Unsourced Material

edit

Moved info here from an article for being unsourced long-term. Please feel free to source and reincorporate into an article. Freshh (talk) 16:16, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cancellation concerns.

edit

Here's Lucy was undoubtedly popular with audiences during its run, is it true that Lucille Ball herself wished the series to end after season five? Season six was produced without Ball's blessing and ratings dropped significantly. Another often unclear mentioning is the many guest stars. Why were there some many guest stars on this show? Was it to keep ratings up? This should be mentioned (if the information is out there). Was Here's Lucy canceled under the so-called "Rural Purge"? Did CBS want a seventh season? This should be discussed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClassiCoEditor97 (talkcontribs) 01:36, 13 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

At one time, this article included an acknowledgment that it might have been CBS, rather than Ball, that chose to end the series in 1974. A book about Lucille Ball's various television shows (the name of that book escapes me) claims that CBS canceled the show, but didn't want to embarrass Ball. CBS quietly informed Ball in advance about the decision to cancel the show, so that she could claim it was her idea to end it. This information has been deleted from this article, but the following sentence remains: "It was widely reported at the time that it was Ball's decision not to continue." Why, I wonder, would someone delete the topic, yet leave behind one sentence that raises the issue without then fully addressing it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.139.205.249 (talk) 18:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply