This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 18:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Article lacks almost all historical and current yield information
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article is poorly written, without almost all information, and almost no citations. It is not well linked to the rest of wikipedia, and is linked deceptively to other articles. It is difficult to understand why it is rated so highly by the people who have bothered to read it. Someone with an interest in this topic should turn it into something worth reading. Right now it is not....
Avram Primack (talk) 15:22, 26 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
"Based on available data and general knowledge" does not satisfy for sourcing. Please acknowledge your sources. Un-sourced data will be removed according to terms of this Project. Rgdboer (talk) 01:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Apparently the table was speculative. No source appeared. The table was removed after 40 hours. — Rgdboer (talk) 01:22, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I was wondering about where it came from too, but it would have had issues trying to summarize average yield worldwide with so much variability across countries. Anything like that, when sourced, would probably be best addressed at individual crop articles and instead address general concepts on yield here. KoA (talk) 14:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply