Talk:British Overseas Airways Corporation

Untitled

edit

The service on the flights between New York and London around 1971 was exquisite. A whole different world of air travel. Selah.

Why BA stuff in the InfoBox?

edit

I find it very odd that the InfoBox is mostly about the wrong airline (British Airways). Even the Logo is that of BA, not the Speedbird logo of BOAC. BOAC is NOT BA! I don't have the ability to change it - Adrian Pingstone 09:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

IATA and ICAO code

edit

IATA and ICAO code was BA (ICAO didn't go 3 letters until 1987). http://www.airlinecodes.co.uk/. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.7.18.131 (talk) 03:08, 16 February 2007 (UTC).Reply

Aden Airways

edit

Aden Airways was a subsidiary of BOAC, who owned 100% of the shares. Not sure how to work this airling into the article though. Mjroots (talk) 15:45, 15 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Is 4-wheel walker allowed in the cabin?

edit

--50.98.27.224 (talk) 05:45, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

History

edit

I'm missing quit a lot in the history part, even (what I feel are) significant points, like how it was created (wasn't this a merger?) or its activities during WW2 (didn't they do the aerial route to (neutral) Spain?). I'm sorry, but I don't have the sources at hand to expand myself. --Antheii (talk) 10:28, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

The flew IIRC, to Spain, Portugal, and Sweden during the War, mostly using Lodestars and Dakotas, although for Sweden the Lodestars were later replaced with Mosquitoes. They also flew transatlantic flights to/from Canada via Prestwick using Liberators as well IIRC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.57.101 (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on British Overseas Airways Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in British Overseas Airways Corporation

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of British Overseas Airways Corporation's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Principal_Recommendations":

  • From Caledonian Airways: "Air Transport, The Edwards Report — Principal recommendations". Flight International. 8 May 1969. p. 745.
  • From British United Airways: "The Edwards Report — Principal recommendations". Flight International: 745. 1969-05-08.
  • From British European Airways: "The Edwards Report — Principal recommendations". Flight International: 745. 8 May 1969. Retrieved 16 August 2012.

Reference named "Report_Summary":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 03:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC) Reply

Sorted by removing the cites in question. A legacy of overciting in article. GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)Reply