Talk:Blackpink

Latest comment: 9 hours ago by 750h+ in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This article is well written, provides an overview of the topic, and with suitable sources.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section):   b (inline citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
This review is transcluded from Talk:Blackpink/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Nkon21 (talk · contribs) 19:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Someone who likes maps (talk · contribs) 06:24, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Someone who likes maps: this is not a proper GA review 750h+ 07:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply