Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Connecticut/Archive 1

Archive 1

Untitled comments

Is there any standard for the unsigned "secret" routes, i.e. Route X (Connecticut) where X >= 500? --Tckma 13:10, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

The only article I'm aware of that uses the unsigned number is State Road 695 (Connecticut). There are a few other secret route articles that are titled using their common, nonnumeric designations, e.g. Milford Parkway (Connecticut) and Conland-Whitehead Highway. A few others redirect to the Route article they are most closely related to (e.g. SSR 401 --> Route 20) and where there is a brief mention of them.

In short, there is no hard and fast standard yet for these secret routes but if you have ideas, please do share them. --Polaron | Talk 13:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:State route naming conventions poll/Part2

Your state is invited to participate in discussions for its highway naming convention. Please feel free to participate in this discussion. If you already have a convention that follows the State Name Type xx designation, it is possible to request an exemption as well. Thanks! --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 00:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Stub-a-week project

As you can see from the list, we only have articles for about 25% of the current highways. I would like to create more articles but I will be quite busy with real-life stuff beginning next week for the next few months. Once the CT highway articles are renamed, I am proposing that each of us create one stub article every week. I would like to do more but that is probably the most I can commit to at this time. The article can be as simple as: Route X is a state highway in Connecticut running for xxx miles from Route Y in Town Y to Route Z in Town Z. Of course, you don't have to do this if you don't want to or don't have the time to do so. I just don't want the Project to stagnate. I am hoping we can have articles for 50% of the highways by the end of the year. Thanks again for your help. --Polaron | Talk 14:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Can do. I suggest a format such as what I used for Route 21. Definitely use the {{stateroutect}} infobox and the {{Connecticut-State-Highway-stub}} template. Someone needs to create shield images for 131 and other routes which don't have them. -- Tckma 13:23, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

That's perfect. I'll try and get as many of the missing route shields uploaded this weekend. --Polaron | Talk 13:44, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Route Mileage

How do we find official mileages? -- Tckma 13:14, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

For official mileage, look at the ConnDOT highway log. It will also help identify the exact town for the termini for routes that are near town lines. --Polaron | Talk 13:44, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. It also told me not to rely on Google Maps for state route termini; I had to correct both endpoints of 21. -- Tckma 18:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Naming Convention

Looks like "Connecticut Route X" has been agreed upon... I'm going to write the stubs with that format of title from now on, and redirect "Route X (Connecticut)" to it. How are we handling moves of existing articles? -- Tckma 20:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

I suppose we could go ahead and move them. I may start doing that when I have a longer block of free time available. --Polaron | Talk 01:08, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Free time? What's that?  ;) -- Tckma 13:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Looks like these still have not been moved. Vegaswikian 05:48, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Project directory

Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory. This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. B2T2 22:44, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Infobox curiosity

Out of curiosity, why does this project put the browsing at the bottom of the article instead of at the bottom of the infobox? -- NORTH ^talk 20:59, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

It is against the new standard at WP:USRD... --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Inertia, I guess. The small number of articles that existed prior to the implementation of infobox browsing had them at the bottom. --Polaron | Talk 21:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

True. What a lot of states do is articles with no infobox yet have browsing at the bottom, then move it into the infobox once it's implemented. -- NORTH ^talk 21:39, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

On the same note, it appears that {{Stateroutect}} can easily be converted to read directly from {{Infobox road}} since the look of the two boxes is very similar. Would anyone be opposed to this conversion (which would ultimately result in the browse being moved to the infobox)? --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 01:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

No objection on my part. Anything that improves the infoboxes would be very welcome. --Polaron | Talk 03:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

The conversion is now complete. I'll add the new available parameters (including browsing) to the project page. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 04:23, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day Awards

Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 15:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

TfD nomination of All USRD Clean-up Templates

All of the USRD Clean-up Templates have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. master son^{T - C} 16:47, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Reminder from USRD

In response to a few issues that came up, we are giving a reminder to all state highway wikiprojects and task forces:

1. Each project needs to remain aware of developments at WT:USRD and subpages to ensure that each project is aware of decisions / discussions that affect that project. It is impossible to notify every single project about every single discussion that may affect it. Therefore, it is the state highway wikiproject's responsiblity to monitor discussions.
2. If a project does not remain aware of such developments and complains later, then there is most likely nothing USRD can do about it.
3. USRD, in most to nearly all cases, will not interfere with a properly functioning state highway wikiproject. All projects currently existing are "properly functioning" for the purposes mentioned here. All task forces currently existing are not "properly functioning" (that is why they are task forces). Departments of USRD (for example, MTF, shields, assessment, INNA) may have specific requirements for the state highway wikiprojects, but complaints regarding those need to be taken up with those departments.
4. However, this is a reminder that USRD standards need to be followed by the state highway wikiprojects, regardless of the age of the wikiproject.

Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 05:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Potential B-class assessments

There are a few articles that are close to or are already at B-class. I would like some opinion as to what is needed by these articles to be promoted to B-class. The list is here. Thanks. --Polaron | Talk 00:35, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

I've basically upgraded all of the items on the list to B-class after some improvements. If there are any that need to be downgraded, please let me know. --Polaron | Talk 16:45, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

• The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
• The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
• A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 22:03, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Template:CTint

Hey, I created a {{CTint}} to use for junction lists. It is used in Pennsylvania as {{PAint}}. From using this template within WP:PASH, I think this would be a simpler way of making junction lists. See Pennsylvania Route 39 and Connecticut Route 72 for examples. I was working on Route 72's exit list guide to bring it to standard, when I worked on the junction list. If people don't want to make this change, I'll revert Route 72 back. --Son (talk) 17:20, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:11, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 08:59, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:10, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

RFC on coordinates in highway articles

There is currently a discussion taking place at WT:HWY regarding the potential use of coordinates in highway articles. Your input is welcomed. --Rschen7754 01:53, 26 December 2011 (UTC)