Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Industrial design

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Cl3phact0 in topic Is this project active?
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Industrial_design
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Industrial_design
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Industrial_design/Things_you_can_do
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Industrial_design/Sandbox
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Industrial_design/New articles
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Industrial_design/Peer_Review
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Industrial_design/Assessment
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Industrial_design/Announcement
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Industrial_design/Things_you_can_do/to_do




WikiProject Industrial design (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Project This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

(If you are a member of the project and want to make specific comments about it, please go here instead.)







A new newsletter directory is out!Edit

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Advice requestedEdit

Hi there

I'm wondering if I can get some help and advice from people in this group. I work for the industrial designer Jasper Morrison and I'd like to add to his page. Having declared COI, I've been advised to add suggested edits to his Talk page. I added a list of Publications, which were quickly accepted. Now I've added a list of Exhibitions, which have been in limbo for a bit. I've sourced them as far as is possible and they are documented in monographs about Jasper, which are published independently. Please tell me how I can make this kind of information acceptable to the Wikipedia community. Thanks.

JT at JMLtd (talk) 13:42, 5 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request for information on WP1.0 web toolEdit

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User script to detect unreliable sourcesEdit

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

  • John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Car layout § Requested move 27 July 2022Edit

  You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Car layout § Requested move 27 July 2022. —usernamekiran (talk) 01:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is this project active?Edit

Is this project active? If not, how would one go about reviving it? Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 17:33, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]