Wikipedia talk:WikiProject East Asia
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject East Asia page.
|Archives: 1, 2, 3|
|WikiProject East Asia (Inactive)|
|WikiProject Articles for creation||(Rated Project-class)|
|To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, all WikiProject East Asia talk pages redirect here.|
|Bangkok, Thailand – 05-08-2020|
|24 days to go|
Discussion of interest at Reliable Sources NoticeboardEdit
The following discussion is of interest to members at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Using of primary genetics sources at Uyghur (and many other Eurasian pages).--Ermenrich (talk) 18:00, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Request for information on WP1.0 web toolEdit
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
RFC on whether Simplified and Traditional Chinese characters count as the same nameEdit
Please see Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/China_and_Chinese-related_articles#Request_for_comment:_Do_the_traditional_and_simplified_forms_of_Chinese_count_as_the_same_name_or_different_names_in_regards_to_eligibility_of_displaying_characters? WhisperToMe (talk) 07:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
RfC on scope of wet market articleEdit
Requesting expansion and update edit supportEdit
I am looking for proactive expansion and update support/input help the following (So far neglected but important topic) articles, if possible. Even if you feel your focus area bit different still contribution of few line may help bring in some different perspective and also help Wikipedia goal of neutrality. If you can't spare time but if you know any good references you can note those on talk pages.
This has been posted to this forum since, one of article review suggested to have more diverse editor participation to have more inclusive, neutral and balanced worldview
I hope and request some editors from this forum too proactively and constructively participate in updating and expanding of article Islamic advice literature
Thanks, warm regards and greetings
Torah as source for the Mongol word for law?Edit
Can anyone comment on this discussion: Talk:Torah#Torah in other languages? It's claimed, with a source (supposedly, not online) that the Torah is the source of the Manchu word doro, via Mongol dörö.--Ermenrich (talk) 14:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)