Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Brands/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

dominator nx650

I dominator n650 1997 and by mistake bought a 1993 model wiring harness want know wether it will work efficiently on the 97 model.

Requested move at Talk:Fortune Brands (1969–2011)#Requested move 8 August 2021

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Fortune Brands (1969–2011)#Requested move 8 August 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Shibbolethink ^{(♔ ♕)} 18:40, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Odwalla FAR

I have nominated Odwalla for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 20:38, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Diffusal of Category:Watch brands

Is anyone willing to create categories to assist in diffusal of this category? The category seems to have gotten too large for a category that appears to be too generic, where there already exist other subcategories to serve this purpose. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Holden FAR

I have nominated Holden for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Bumbubookworm (talk) 06:51, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Request for AfC review

Hello, I submitted draft:Iqos back in December and even though it has been positively reviewed by a couple of editors I suspect it has now been buried within the huge AfC backlog. I've based my work off the Assessment grading scheme and I'm pretty happy with the draft (70+ citations, images and so on), so anyone willing to give the last push or any feedback is welcome. Thank you, Aphis Marta (talk) 09:58, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

Hello, Please note that Google, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team

The picture of a another Camera, a Zeiss Ikon is very misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8071:82CF:1800:84:70DA:FFEE:7C85 (talk) 11:44, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources

Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliable

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Waldorf–Astoria (1893–1929)

Should Waldorf–Astoria (1893–1929) have a dash or a hyphen? Comment at Talk:Waldorf–Astoria (1893–1929)#Shouldn't it be hyphen?. GA-RT-22 (talk) 21:43, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Pentax-Seiko relationship

See discussion at Talk:Pentax#Seiko regarding relationship between Pentax and Seiko.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:15, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

FAR for Maserati MC12

I have nominated Maserati MC12 for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 00:16, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:No poo#Requested move 2 August 2022

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:No poo#Requested move 2 August 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 15:10, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments are used by Wikipedia editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 20:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Twitter

Twitter has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Tartan track#Requested move 11 August 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Tartan track#Requested move 11 August 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 07:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Post-it Note#Requested move 13 August 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Post-it Note#Requested move 13 August 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:56, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Neff GmbH#Requested move 6 January 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Neff GmbH#Requested move 6 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:58, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for EVA Air

EVA Air has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:10, 13 January 2024 (UTC)