|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the General disclaimer page.
|If you are new to editing Wikipedia, you are probably on the wrong page. Do not ask general questions on this page. Do not talk about articles on this page.|
This page is for discussing the Wikipedia page Wikipedia:General disclaimer. To comment on an article, go back to that article's talk page. To find out how to ask questions and get answers, see Wikipedia:Questions.
|This page is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
|Wikipedia:General disclaimer is a reader-facing page intended for viewing by non-editors. Please prioritize their needs when adjusting its design, and move editor-facing elements to other pages.|
The disclaimer contains 2 links to article-space. One is "personality rights", which seems quite reasonable. The other is "United States of America". What is the purpose of linking such a broad topic here? I don't know if something like "WP:OVERLINK applies outside of article-space, but in any case, I fail to see how linking this redirect to "United States" does anything to help clarify the subject for the reader. Joefromrandb (talk) 09:09, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 26 March 2015
|This edit request has been answered. Set the |
Just a minor grammatical fix (add necessary comma):
If you need specific advice (for example, medical, legal, financial or risk management), please seek a professional who is licensed or knowledgeable in that area. Esquivalience t 00:48, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 17 December 2015
|This edit request has been answered. Set the |
- Done although it's curious that the prot log is completely empty. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia Self Defeating
Wikimedia:General disclaimer 
"Please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information".
Yet Wikipedia, "Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources",  disallows those of us with the Formal Schooling, Formal Training and Firsthand Experience from actually providing that complete, accurate or reliable information. While Wikipedia allows those with opinionated blogs (no Firsthand Experience easily detected by those with actual Firsthand Experience, Formal Training, Formal Schooling, etc.) being able to use their Opinionated Blogs as a Reference according to the Rules of Wikipedia.
The Results, Wikipedia is not a Reliable Source of Information, according to Wikipedia's own Disclaimers.
Irony other internet sites that used Wikipedia are only propagating the misinformation that was originally from Wikipedia, then others use those very same sites as sources to edit Wikipedia after those with the actual facts edited Wikipedia to provide "complete, accurate or reliable information."
"Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. When change is absolute there remains no being to improve and no direction is set for possible improvement: and when experience is not retained, as among savages, infancy is perpetual. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. In the first stage of life the mind is frivolous and easily distracted, it misses progress by failing in consecutiveness and persistence. This is the condition of children and barbarians, in which instinct has learned nothing from experience." George Santayana  and those of us that actually read George Santayana's entire The Life of Reason, with the Wikipedia Article George Santayana then misquoting George Santayana's critism of Progressives as "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it"  and completely deleting the previous in context full quote.
To change 'much of the time' to 'most of the time' ("That is not to say that you will not find valuable and accurate information in Wikipedia; much of the time you will"). 'Much of the time' reads as if Wikipedia's information is less than 50% accurate, while of course the percentage is very much higher. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:16, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
"The Wikipedia database is stored on servers in the United States of America..."
Not entirely true. It should say "The Wikipedia database is stored on servers in the United States of America, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, and the Republic of Singapore, and is maintained in reference to the protections afforded under the laws of these countries. Laws in your country or jurisdiction may not protect or allow the same kinds of speech or distribution..." lo prenu .katmakrofan. (talk) 21:11, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
- @KATMAKROFAN: while the non-USA centers have caching clusters for HTML and for file/thumbnails, the databases are only located in the US. The codfw and eqiad (aka the application clusters) are the only clusters that can run the entire website, and the clusters that almost all requests for all logged in users will end up at. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 00:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
New Wiki Page
"Wikipedia:5D" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:5D. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 25#Wikipedia:5D until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. the ultraUsurper 03:37, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Review source for Wikipedia:General disclaimer
1. No contract; limited license
Please make sure that you understand that the information provided here is being provided freely, and that no kind of agreement or contract is created between you and the owners or users of this site, the owners of the servers upon which it is housed, the individual Wikipedia contributors, any project administrators, sysops or anyone else who is in ''any way connected'' with this project or sister projects subject to your claims against them directly. You are being granted a limited license to copy anything from this site; it does not create or imply any contractual or extracontractual liability on the part of Wikipedia or any of its agents, members, organizers, or other users.
There is '''no agreement or understanding between you and Wikipedia''' regarding your use or modification of this information beyond the [[Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License|Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License]] (CC-BY-SA) and the [[Wikipedia:Text of the GNU Free Documentation License|GNU Free Documentation License]] (GFDL); neither is anyone at Wikipedia responsible should someone change, edit, modify or remove any information that you may post on Wikipedia or any of its associated projects.
Any of the trademarks, service marks, collective marks, design rights or similar rights that are mentioned, used, or cited in the articles of the Wikipedia encyclopedia are the property of their respective owners. Their use here does not imply that you may use them for any purpose other than for the same or a similar informational use as contemplated by the original authors of these Wikipedia articles under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL licensing schemes. Unless otherwise stated Wikipedia and Wikimedia sites are neither endorsed by nor affiliated with any of the holders of any such rights and as such Wikipedia cannot grant any rights to use any otherwise protected materials. Your use of any such or similar incorporeal property is at your own risk.
6. Jurisdiction and legality of content
Publication of information found in Wikipedia may be in violation of the laws of the country or jurisdiction from where you are viewing this information. The Wikipedia database is stored on servers in the United States of America
, and is maintained in reference to about the protections afforded under local and federal law. Laws in your country or jurisdiction may not protect or allow the same kinds of speech or distribution. Wikipedia does not encourage the violation of any laws , and cannot be responsible for any violations of such laws, should you link to this domain or use, reproduce jurisdiction or republish the information contained herein.