Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation

(Redirected from Wikipedia talk:AVIATION)
Latest comment: 13 days ago by Nimbus227 in topic Category:Nose-mounted intake jet fighter
WikiProject:Aviation exists to co-ordinate Wikipedia's aviation content. However, if you are here to ask a question or raise a concern about a particular article, it may be better directed to one of the following sub-projects:
 
Aviation WikiProject announcements and open tasks
watch · edit · discuss

Today's featured article requests

Did you know

Articles for deletion

Proposed deletions

Redirects for discussion

Featured article candidates

A-Class review

Good article nominees

Peer reviews

Requested moves

Articles to be merged

Articles to be split

Articles for creation

(3 more...)

View full version (with review alerts)
Aviation WikiProject
Articles for review



Good article reassessment for Wright brothers edit

Wright brothers has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Nose-mounted intake jet fighter edit

Wikipedian2024 created Category:Nose-mounted intake jet fighter earlier today. I'm not sure that categories for fighter aircraft based on the placement of jet engine intakes is particularly useful, and is probably a bit too narrow in scope for a Wikipedia category. Thoughts? - ZLEA T\C 22:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

It is also barely comprehensible as a term. Intakes aren't 'mounted'. An intake is a hole to let the air in... AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:55, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
More technically known as a pitot intake. Categories without parent articles are in trouble from day 1. It's over-categorisation per WP:TRIVIALCAT. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 10:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
What Nimbus said. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 12:43, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I reminds me of the category "pink-spotted twin-engined biplanes" (or something similar) that was once proposed - in joke, I assume. These "categories" never made much sense to me, anyway, but of course to each their own. Jan olieslagers (talk) 13:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I think it was biplane tractors with unicorn sprinkles. I have nominated the category for deletion, linking to this discussion but feel free to comment there (or thereabouts). The creator should be aware as they were pinged at the top of this discussion and should also be watching the category. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 14:43, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
My consent/support was added. And yes, your memory is obviously stronger than mine :). Cheers! Jan olieslagers (talk) 14:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
The category has just been deleted (2 April), the discussion was closed as delete over two weeks ago and the category must have been in some hidden backlog pile waiting for deletion. To get it deleted I had to add a speedy template that linked to the closed deletion discussion, crazy! Just for info if we have to nominate other categories, the system is not intuitive (to me at least!). Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 13:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Revived discussion at Talk:Rolls-Royce Mustang Mk.X edit

An old discussion has been revived. Feel free to chime in. - ZLEA T\C 23:15, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requested move at Talk:Alan Joyce (businessman)#Requested move 10 March 2024 edit

 

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Alan Joyce (businessman)#Requested move 10 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Killarnee (talk) 02:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Aeroflot destinations edit

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Aeroflot destinations. Sunnya343 (talk) 17:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Boeing controversies section edit

There is currently a discussion at Talk:Boeing#Intrigue/Conspiracies Section about the possible addition of a "Controversies" section to the article. This is primarily a response to the death of John Barnett (whistleblower) and other recent Boeing controversies, as well as a conspiracy theory that seems to be getting some attention. - ZLEA T\C 05:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Reply