Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/Noticeboard/Old/Help

Music-related articles in need of help edit

Unknown music genre edit

I am looking of a definition of a music/song genre, a kind of "urban musical folklore". Its distinctive feature is that it is related with a specific modern profession or occupation. (I say "modern", to distinguish the most obvious example of "cowboy songs" of country music). These songs usually target a particular professional audience, heavyly loaded with professional slang and humor.

Some examples:

The latter one goes something like,

I've bought a terminal
The day I lost my gal
... etc.
Now I have girls galore
I my new mem'ry core
I put them on disk file
To store them for a while... etc.
Refrain:
Memory d'amour,
Put the core to the printer
Or to the display
Please without delay.

I'd very much like to see two things: the article about the genre and the info about this IBM music. Surprisingly, I cannot find its traces in the internet. mikka (t) 20:25, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Technical help needed edit

Would someone with a background in technical music writing please take a look at Talk:Dixie (song)? The source I used to write most of the main "Dixie (song)" article gives a quite technical description of the song, which flies right over my head. I've bulleted the points he makes on the talk page in the hopes that someone who understands his terminology will translate into common English and determine whether any of it deserves inclusion in the main article. Thanks! BrianSmithson 15:57, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Peer comments on Tool (band) edit

Hi folks, I would like to ask you a favor: I have been working on the Tool article for almost a year now and would like to pass it on to Peer review pretty soon. Before doing so, I would be interested in any qualified comments by co-editors who have already written good or featured articles in the same field. Like I said, any comments are welcome. Of course, if anyone is interested for my comments in exchange, I'd be more then glad to help out. Best wishes. --Johnnyw 19:33, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's a pretty... complete... article there. I haven't had a chance to go through the whole thing yet, but my initial reaction is that the intro is way too big and rather messy to read. It's one of the dangers of good citations, I'd be willing to bet. I'd move to have the intro cut down to the basics and move the important citations to the body of the article in some fashion, but that's an initial reaction; I'll give it a proper read later. Xinit 23:43, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In need of some assisatnce - Lists edit

I am almost finished fixing the naming conventions on the List of songs about drugs page, and have found similar musical lists which need fixing in the same way and don't think I can do it on my own as I may go crazy. If anyone would like to help me then I'd be very thankful. I'm asking this here because people involved in this WikiProject will be more likely to know how to make the needed changes. Here's the pages I have in mind so far (and what needs to be done):

Done. Took two seconds to change the italics to quotes, and a few more seconds to check the diff. Λυδαcιτγ 21:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done. This one took a lot longer because of the varying formats. Λυδαcιτγ 23:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Λυδαcιτγ 19:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Λυδαcιτγ 04:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done. The articles pertaining to it could use some work, its not very through. CraigP 02:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Λυδαcιτγ 16:31, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Didn't change around the names, though - I can if it makes sense. Λυδαcιτγ 16:31, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Λυδαcιτγ 23:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done. CraigP 02:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Λυδαcιτγ 02:51, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also need a second opinion on the List of songs about drugs article about changing all the — marks to "by". Aa you can see, it's a lot of work to be done and I'm sure there are more lists that also need work. I severly doubt I can do this alone. Tartan 16:26, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have Firefox? If so, use User:Cacycle/editor - it'll save you a ton of time. I'll get started on the simple search-and-replace stuff. Λυδαcιτγ 21:03, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't. I'm not even sure what that is (the Cacyle thing)... *laughs nervously* Tartan 21:04, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. Λυδαcιτγ 21:20, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All done! Praise User:Cacycle/editor. Λυδαcιτγ 19:51, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • claps* Thanks very much! I haven't been around much to edit over the summer holidays here... it's a very lazy time for me. Tartan 13:10, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

needs NPOVing. JesseW 02:06, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

done MarkBuckles 02:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

not clear what needs doing. Is it good enough already? JesseW 02:36, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Was in terrible shape. Did a big overhaul. MarkBuckles 10:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

rewrite JesseW 02:36, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

done MarkBuckles 02:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

unformatted JesseW 02:36, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Completed MarkBuckles 02:54, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to the disambiguation page, the article Crisis (band) should cope with the US heavy metal group, but actually, both Crisis (band) and Crisis (British band) speak of that British punk rock group... Can somebody help? -- 20:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Fixed! Check it all over if you like (had to sort out the disambig page as well as the 2 articles) and make any modifications you think are needed. Madder 00:45, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

contains a ridiculous amount of errors, and I need help converting its code. Please help! --Phantasy Phanatik 09:09, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Everything past the history section is full of POV's and OR. Most of it should probably be deleted. MarkBuckles (talk) 05:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved. Much of article has been rewritten. MarkBuckles (talk) 03:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

needs POV clean up very badly. Dalf | Talk 20:18, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

B-class. Λυδαcιτγ 02:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need copyedit. It was my first major editing job and it should be reviewed. Thanks. Wangster 18:33, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Has been copyedited. Λυδαcιτγ 02:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I ran across this article recently. Can someone find out more about the nobility of this band and clean up or mark for CSD/AFD as needed? I would like to but I don't know enough about music to really make a good determination or not. - Hbdragon88 06:36, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deleted (A7). Λυδαcιτγ 02:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Neologism: Hi! I just noticed the new article touring label, which is not written in a particularly encyclopedic style. At the end of the article, it mentions that the term was coined by G. David Daniels of WCA Entertainment, who also appears to be the author of the article. (User:Ddaniels@wca-entertainment.com). If someone who is familiar with the music industry could glance over the article, and sort out whether it's describing a recognized phenomenon or just promoting WCA Entertainment, it would be great. Thanks! FreplySpang 17:58, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Touring label). Λυδαcιτγ 02:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This has had a notability notice almost since I began it, and I'm not sure what else to do. Could folks take a look at it? Suggestions? Aleta 09:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like notability has been made clear. Λυδαcιτγ 02:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to get this to Featured Article, and I want some help. Thanks.--CJ King 18:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hasn't been edited recently. Λυδαcιτγ 02:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that the band Linkin Park isn't covered under this project. Just thought you guys should know. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 03:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the above article a week ago and tagged it for notability. In that week the notability tag has been removed and nothing in the way of references added, they've also had one of their songs deleted as non-notable. I've re-added the notability tag because the article only has one active editor and gives the appearance of being "we've got a Myspace page, lets get one on Wikipedia". Could someone from here with a better knowledge of band notability have a look at it and see if it should be marked AFD. Thanks - X201 10:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's up on AFD now. Garion96 (talk) 17:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ne'er-do-wells). Λυδαcιτγ 02:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

==[[Love. Angel. Music. Baby Recently at FAC (after a not-very-helpful peer review) but failed due to concerns about the tone of the article. WP:LoCE has a huge backlog, so I'd appreciate it if someone could lend a hand since I've worked on the article to much to be able to take a fresh look at it. ShadowHalo 15:11, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedited intro. Anyone else want to lend a hand? Λυδαcιτγ 00:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for doing a copyedit. Just a note in case anyone else wants to take a look at the article, it may be worth looking at the "Conception and writing" section since the comments at FAC mentioned that. ShadowHalo 01:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now a GA, and back at FAC. Λυδαcιτγ 17:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of vital articles edit

The below are vital articles that should be at least Good Articles, from the List of articles all languages should have (in music and composers and musicians). Λυδαcιτγ 14:45, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

B-class. Almost uncited. Λυδαcιτγ 03:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Good information and pictures; needs audio. Λυδαcιτγ 03:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not wikified; no references. Λυδαcιτγ 03:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A-class. Λυδαcιτγ 03:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
B-class. Looks close to a GA to me. Λυδαcιτγ 03:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:B-class; no sources.Λυδαcιτγ 03:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC) — Completely overhauled between 8 and 26 December 2007. ↔ Dennywuh (talk) 20:21, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good amount of info, but only 2 references. Λυδαcιτγ 03:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delisted GA for lack of photo. Λυδαcιτγ 03:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Good amount of info, but only 3 sources. Λυδαcιτγ 03:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
B-class; lots of sources, but not enough inline citations. Λυδαcιτγ 01:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
B-class. Λυδαcιτγ 01:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
B-class. Λυδαcιτγ 01:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Start-class; almost no biography. Λυδαcιτγ 01:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Start-class; almost no biography. Λυδαcιτγ 01:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
B-class. Λυδαcιτγ 01:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
B-class. Λυδαcιτγ 01:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Former FA; failed GA. Λυδαcιτγ 01:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
B-class. Λυδαcιτγ 01:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Good info; few citations. Λυδαcιτγ 01:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
B-class. Λυδαcιτγ 01:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Too short; uncited. Λυδαcιτγ 01:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Lots of info; few inline citations. Λυδαcιτγ 01:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
B-class. Λυδαcιτγ 01:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Inline citations needed to get to GA. Λυδαcιτγ 01:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Lots of info; few references. Λυδαcιτγ 01:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Close to a GA. Λυδαcιτγ 01:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Lots of info; few references. Λυδαcιτγ 01:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Start-class. Λυδαcιτγ 01:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not in good shape. Λυδαcιτγ 01:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]