Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Emmerdale task force/Assessment

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Television‎ | Emmerdale task force
(Redirected from Wikipedia:WikiProject Emmerdale/Assessment)

This page is here to provide a consolidated list of all rated articles within the scope of Wikiproject Emmerdale. It should allow for easy identification of which articles are in desperate need of a cleanup or expansion. If you disagree with a rating or level of importance an article has been given, be bold and change it! If you do change the rating of an article, please change it both on this Assessment page and on the corresponding talk page of the selected article.

Contents:
1 Main Articles
2 Character Articles
3 Past Character Articles
4 Emmerdale Cast Member Articles
Instructions

Main Articles edit

Article Need Quality Comments
Emmerdale Mid Start Is in desperate need of a tidy up. References needed, more information, organisation and pictures.
List of recurring Emmerdale characters Mid Start Newly created article from suggestions and proposals discussed within the Wikiproject. Most recurring characters with articles now have their articles directed here, with new entrants cast in the future to be added if on a recurring basis.

Character Articles edit

Article Need Quality Comments
Louise Appleton Mid Stub Inappropriate tone and in-universe style
Grace Barraclough Low Stub Proposed for merger
Edna Birch Mid Stub Needs more information and a change of tone
Rodney Blackstock Mid Stub Needs more formal tone and less in-universe style
Bridget Burgess Low Stub Proposed for merger
Vikesh Dasari Low Stub Proposed for merger
Belle Dingle Mid Start Lot of character history but needs restructuring, some efforts to make less in-universe
Chas Dingle Mid Stub Needs more formal tone and less in-universe style
Debbie Dingle Mid Stub Lacks a lot of information, and covers little information about the character and history.
Del Dingle Mid Stub Unorganised and needs a rewrite and make more encyclopedic
Eli Dingle Mid Stub Unorganised and needs a rewrite and make more encyclopedic
Lisa Dingle Mid Stub Unorganised and needs a rewrite and make more encyclopedic
Marlon Dingle Mid Start Information has been structured but needs a change in tone and making less in-universe
Sam Dingle Mid Stub Unorganised and needs a rewrite and make more encyclopedic
Shadrach Dingle Mid Stub Needs major cleanup and change in tone
Zak Dingle Mid Start Article has a fair amount of information, but nowhere near as much as there could be.
Betty Eagleton Mid Stub Unorganised and needs a rewrite and make more encyclopedic
Daz Eden Mid Stub Unorganised and needs a rewrite and make more encyclopedic
Jonny Foster Low Stub Proposed for merger
Bob Hope Mid Start Needs making less in-universe in style
Eddie Hope Low Stub Proposed for merger
Jamie Hope Mid Stub Needs cleanup and re-write
Viv Hope Mid Stub Although there is a fair bit of information the whole article needs a rewrite to make it encyclopedic
Billy Hopwood Low Start Writing style is better but still needs expanding, referencing, etc.
Perdita Hyde-Sinclair Mid Stub Needs re-writing and change in tone
Carl King Mid Stub Needs rewriting as current article is not in a formal tone and primarily in-universe. Out of date information
Jimmy King Mid Stub Needs rewriting as current article is not in a formal tone and primarily in-universe. Out of date information
Matthew King Mid Stub Needs rewriting as current article is not in a formal tone and primarily in-universe.
Rosemary King Mid Start Needs expansion and reformatting but tone is better than most entries
Emily Kirk Mid Stub Needs rewriting as current article is not in a formal tone and primarily in-universe
Paddy Kirk Mid Stub The article has problems with tone and in-universe style
Pearl Ladderbanks Mid Stub Unorganised and needs a rewrite and make more encyclopedic
Paul Lambert Mid Stub Unorganised and needs a rewrite and make more encyclopedic
Sharon Lambert Low Start Proposed for merger
Val Lambert Mid Stub Unorganised and needs a rewrite and make more encyclopedic
Carrie Nicholls Low B Tone is more encyclopedic, referenced and formatted, should be reduced though if not kept up to date
Scarlet Nicholls Low Stub Has only basic information on the character.
David Metcalfe Low Stub Needs expansion
John McNally Low Stub Proposed for merger
Eric Pollard Mid Stub Although there is a fair bit of information the whole article needs a rewrite to make it encyclopedic
Hari Prasad Mid Stub Needs change of tone, and expanding
Len Reynolds Mid Stub Needs a change in tone and making less in-universe
Grayson Sinclair Mid Stub Needs re-writing and change in tone
Jo Stiles Mid Stub Needs a change in tone and making less in-universe
Andy Sugden Mid Start Information has been better structured than most but needs cleanup and change of tone
Diane Sugden Mid Start Has been given a slight rewrite and structure, but improvements can still be made with regards to character history and photography
Jack Sugden Mid B One of the most important characters in the programme, given he is now the longest serving who is still active. Article has a wealth of information, but could do with some pictures and expansion on a few events. Needs to be less in-universe to be upgraded
Katie Sugden Mid Stub Unorganised and needs a rewrite and make more encyclopedic
Victoria Sugden Mid Stub Unorganised and needs a rewrite and make more encyclopedic
Ashley Thomas Mid Stub Requires a lot of cleanup
Jasmine Thomas Mid Stub Needs reworking, more formal tone and less in-universe
Laurel Thomas Mid Stub Needs re writing to be more encyclopedic and less in-universe
Sandy Thomas Mid Stub Information needs expansion with more character information
Alan Turner Mid Stub Although there is a fair bit of information the whole article needs a rewrite to make it encyclopedic
Kelly Windsor Mid Stub Unorganised and needs a rewrite and make more encyclopedic
Scott Windsor Mid Start Generally better than some other articles but still needs rewriting and making more encyclopedic in nature
Donna Windsor-Dingle Mid Start Fair amount of information but still a lot of improvements needed
Terry Woods Mid Stub Although some information it is not encyclopedic in tone and needs to be completely re-written
Charles Vaughan Low Stub Proposed for merger

Past Character Articles edit

Article Need Quality Comments
Chloe Atkinson Low Stub Includes very minimul character information. Tone is sufficient, though could do with expansion & photography.
Tom King One of the most iconic characters to the show during his run from 2004-2006. Has a fairly well organised article, but can still have more information added.

Emmerdale Cast Member Articles edit

Article Need Quality Comments
Andrew Burt Low Stub Needs table, filmography, more information and to be set out in accordance with the Manual of Style
Chris Chittell Mid Stub Needs filmography, more information and to be set out in accordance with the Manual of Style
Toby Cockerell Low Stub Needs table, filmography, more information and to be set out in accordance with the Manual of Style
Ben Freeman Mid Start Needs table, filmography, more information and to be set out in accordance with the Manual of Style
Clive Hornby Mid Stub Needs table, filmography, more information and to be set out in accordance with the Manual of Style
Sophie Jeffery Low Stub Needs table, filmography, more information and to be set out in accordance with the Manual of Style
Deena Payne Mid Stub Needs table, filmography, more information and to be set out in accordance with the Manual of Style
Verity Rushworth Mid Stub Needs table, filmography, more information and to be set out in accordance with the Manual of Style
Adele Silva Mid Start Some information but still needs filmography, more information and to be set out in accordance with the Manual of Style
Richard Thorp Mid Stub Needs table, filmography, more information and to be set out in accordance with the Manual of Style

Instructions edit

Emmerdale articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA Total
  GA 3 2 5
B 3 1 4
C 1 1 16 20 38
Start 12 109 121
Stub 1 1
List 2 3 40 1 46
Category 21 21
File 14 14
Project 1 1
Redirect 3 212 215
Template 2 2
Assessed 5 4 74 137 248 468
Total 5 4 74 137 248 468
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 785 Ω = 4.64


Quality scale edit

WikiProject article quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
  FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
    6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.[under discussion] Cleopatra
(as of June 2018)
  FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  2. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  3. Comprehensiveness.
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
  5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events
(as of May 2018)
  A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. Battle of Nam River
(as of June 2014)
  GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
A good article is:
  1. Well-written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Discovery of the neutron
(as of April 2019)
B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Psychology
(as of January 2024)
C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Wing
(as of June 2018)
Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
  • A useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. Ball
(as of September 2014)
Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Lineage (anthropology)
(as of December 2014)
List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of literary movements

Importance assessment edit

An article's importance assessment is generated from the |importance= parameter in the {{WikiProject Television|emmerdale=y}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Television|emmerdale=y| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

All articles that lack an importance rating are categorized in Category:Unknown-importance Emmerdale articles.

Importance scale edit

This grid is presently blank. Please discuss suitable content at the project's talk page.
Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Top
High
Mid
Low
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Television/Emmerdale_task_force/Assessment&oldid=1008031191"