Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 11

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 10 January 12 >

January 11 edit

Template:Unblock-bot edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template since a while ago per the previous TFD. We're three years down the road and no other effort has been employed to use a template like this. Izno (talk) 23:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The fact that nothing has changed since 2019's TfD is evidence in itself that this isn't needed. Gonnym (talk) 00:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hostname edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not likely to be used. Last substings were in 2006 timeframe. We have other templates for similar since. Izno (talk) 23:19, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Christian list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused without potential for use. Izno (talk) 23:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cleanup e-prime edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seeming joke in the template space, only used on one page. Izno (talk) 22:07, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete as single-use template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject India essays edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 23:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links to only three essays, where one link is a redirect. From the category for the project, there are only four essay pages. But navboxes are not for essays for specific projects and if they were, it would still fail the requirements that navboxes are to be used for navigating between articles, not essays. The Wikipedia Essay template is not similar to this, as those essays relate to the broader scope about Wikipedia-related topics, not specific to a project. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. There is no such requirement. Navboxes provide an easy way to link sets of pages. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Just because there is no such requirement doesn't mean it has reason to stay. You're gonna need to provide why this template is beneficial. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:23, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Other than what Jonesey95 has said this is one of the largest WikiProjects and essay template is in scope, --Titodutta (talk) 06:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Titodutta, the project being one of the largest is not of relevance here. The issue is that the template doesn't fulfill its navigational prupose. Since there are four essays, how could having a template like this help members of the project? Couldn't it be better to link them as a list on the main page of the project? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello, thanks for your comment. I don't think my message is completely understood, or probably I need to explain it a little bit more: what I meant is- this is one of the largest WikiPorjects and linked the main category. With several projects, initiatives conducted, being conducted more links can be added in the template. What I did not want to do, adding a few links right away. Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 01:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The size of the project has nothing to do with this template. The template is in the scope of the project but you have not addressed the concern of the nomination. You could only add one more link to the template as there are currently three out of the four essays linked. But I don't see the navigation this is supposed to provide. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think you're confusing the nomination with the template below or you're not understanding anything at all. Please reread the nomination. This has nothing to do with the India project as a whole. Just something that doesn't seem beneficial to the project. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Obviously, as above. As there is no such requirement. OP is making up his own rules and enforcing them through mass AfDs without getting any consensus. WikiCleanerMan, Everytime you get such strange ideas, please get them vetted from the community at the WP:VP or other relvant place, before enforcing them and wasting everyone's time. --Venkat TL (talk) 10:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
PA's won't work well and you don't understand how these discussion formats work. This is a place to get consensus. You're only voting to keep that has nothing to do with the nomination as you have done multiple times elsewhere and to make false accusations. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Has usage in the WikiProject as well as individual's talk pages. Unless a WikiProject is defunct, I generally think only a WikiProject should delete/groom its materials. And even then {{Archived}} tag can be used to preserve historic documents. In this case, it's very much useful. Adding one additional essay without a template would require searching multiple places/adding it, without a central way to do that, nor discuss the relevance of inclusion/exclusion of any specific essays. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 14:46, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:India quick links edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 00:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A navbox that links to the various India-related project pages but is primarily used on user talk pages for some reason. Navboxes are for articles and there are no articles here. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Jonesey here. Navboxes can be used for collection of pages that aren't only articles and as long as they serve a useful purpose then they are doing their job. Gonnym (talk) 01:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's mostly on user talk pages. Only used on one or two India project pages. Don't see the usefulness of it when on each project page there is already a infobox that links the same project pages already. I think a full list of template types that are not just for articles need to be provided. I'm not aware of projects using navboxes such as this. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is always much to learn at Wikipedia. Today is the day that WikiCleanerMan learns about projects that use navboxes exactly like this one. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All are very problematic. Most are used on talk pages of users which I don't understand why it's there. Some are not even used. This one and the rest don't seem to be good use of template space. I don't think navigation between the project and its task force was something needing a navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
When I encounter something that I do not understand on Wikipedia, and then someone explains it to me, and I still don't understand, I leave it alone. Someone not understanding why a particular page or set of pages exists is not a valid deletion criterion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jonesey95, it's not that I don't understand and have made up random deletion criteria. You have misunderstood. The reason this template should be deleted is because the navigational aspect is not used or provided. Aside from linking to the WikiProject pages, can you figure out why they're transcluded on the talk pages of user's instead of project spaces? The template is not fulfilling its purpose. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:33, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep: This template is important, just giving a personal example, you can see the template on my user page also (it has been there for quite sometime). This has a comprehensive list of all important pages related to the project, and is very helpful for project maintenance/monitoring. --Titodutta (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Titodutta, then why are they on user talk pages instead of on project spaces for the majority of transclusions? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:33, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I am responding below where Gonnym is discussing the same. Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 02:00, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Obviously, as explained above. There is no such requirement as OP claims. OP is making up his own rules and enforcing them through mass AfDs without getting any consensus. WikiCleanerMan, Everytime you get such strange ideas, please get them vetted from the community at the WP:VP or other relvant place, before enforcing them and wasting everyone's time. Venkat TL (talk) 10:34, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
PA's won't work well and you don't understand how these discussion formats work. This is a place to get consensus. You're only voting to keep that has nothing to do with the nomination as you have done multiple times elsewhere and to make false accusations. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: even though I argued that navboxes can be used for non-article sets of pages. I've looked deeper into this one. This seems to be spammed by editors like Gurubrahma and Pamri on random user's talk pages without any additional discussion. Additionally, the pages themselves do not use these navboxes which mean that WP:BIDIRECTIONAL isn't followed and navigation does not work correctly. To be honest, this current situation is bad either way. I would however argue that the talk page message should have been subst and not transcluded. Gonnym (talk) 11:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Gonnym, The same is true for those other quick links for other wikiprojects. They're on a massive amount of talk pages than on project pages. Which doesn't make a lot of sense. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:33, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that there is too much noise sort this out. I support at the minimum substing the talk page spam. This clearly was not asked by any user and it gives the wrong impression as if this template has many more usages than it does (there are ~70 non user talk usages compared to the 1.5k total). Gonnym (talk) 15:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think substituting them on talk pages is a solution. Maybe a bot command could remove them from there if this were to be kept, but there already exists a project infobox that has the same amount of links at Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Navigation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello Gonnym and WikiCleanerMan, it looks like this was added on user talk pages with an unclear reason. I checked a few talk pages and it shows the edits were made in around 2005/2006. Now in 2022, it might look unclear, I am not sure what were the circumstances or if there was some discussion in 2006. Possibly that was the time the WikiProject was being formed, and Wikipedia itself was much different than what it is today. Anyway, now it looks like those talk page template usages do not make sense. I have two observations: a) fix it (I am not sure if we should fix so old edits on talk, however I don't mind), and b) ~61 (+a few on WP namespace) usage are valid. There are people here who have told that the template is useful to them for navigation. Regards --Titodutta (talk) 02:00, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The template provides useful links to users who are interested in WP:INDIA, as the title says. I cannot answer why it was included in user talk pages. I do use it on my user page for a "quick navigation", which probably is the supposed use (along with WP:BIDIRECTIONAL transclusions if useful.) — DaxServer (talk) 17:48, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just send them an invite. Mass adding a template to talk pages gives it the impression is being used for a purpose for the project, but it's not really. It should be removed from the talk pages and added to the project pages since that is the more relevant space for it. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mint 400 Records edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This nav template at one time contained a number of articles but they were all deleted and only one is left now. The template can be recreated if needed in the future. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:48, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Editnotices/Page/Tim Kaine edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 04:49, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think for this page, discretionary sanctions are no longer needed since not much disruption has occurred since the template has been put in in 2016. Interstellarity (talk) 18:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Festivals in Sri Lanka edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 January 18. Izno (talk) 18:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FamilyTree/Start edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. {{Tree chart/start}} is the template that is actually used. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:43, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FSX aircraft edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. This is unsourced single-article content for use at Microsoft Flight Simulator X. It was removed from the article in 2014; the editor linked to WP:GAMECRUFT in their edit summary. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Overly detailed information not used in the article it was intended for. Nigej (talk) 19:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete article content masquerading as a template -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete see above Rlink2 (talk) 22:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FS number edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, or documentation. This template extracts a hand-edited number, twice, from onlyinclude tags within the Wikipedia:Featured sounds page. If this functionality is ever needed, it can be handled easily with section transclusion rather than a template. (Also see previous TFD from 2016.) – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Another 6 years has passed since the TfD noted. Nigej (talk) 19:14, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Template:FS Month Stats, Template:FSCnom/intro and Template:SOTD default which were the only ones listed in the previous TfD still around should be deleted as well. Gonnym (talk) 19:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It's also a template producing purely static information (as Wikipedia:Featured sounds is defunct), which can just be hardcoded on appropriate pages without being transcluded from anywhere. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FIBA Africa Basketball League performance by club edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This template could be substed into FIBA Africa Basketball League, where there is a similar (but out of date and confusing) table that could be replaced or merged with this one. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:48, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FCBL All-Star Game edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:34, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2012, apparently for use in a forthcoming article about a Futures Collegiate Baseball League all-star game, but that article has not been created. There is very likely another suitable template to show baseball game information. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:38, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete 10 years old and unused. Some sort of infobox. Better to use one already at the Baseball project. Nigej (talk) 19:24, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FCBLAllStarGames edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:34, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Fails WP:NAVBOX: no main article, no links to articles in the navbox body. Created in 2012. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete 10 years old and still no content to link to. Nigej (talk) 19:25, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:19, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no links, and none likely to be created. The main season articles haven't been created since 2014, so articles on All Star Games are even less likely to be created ever/anytime soon. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DUNNS edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:34, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. This seems like article content that could be substed into a relevant article, but without documentation or a clear template name, I don't know which article would be appropriate. See also TFD for DUNPanang – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cultural assimilation/list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This code was orphaned without discussion. I have restored it, with updates, into the main template, so the subpage is no longer needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:25, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Heron Communications edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with only two blue links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:53, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:East Central Ohio League graphical timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. This is article content that already exists happily at East Central Ohio League and does not appear to be useful anywhere else. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:49, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Already substed in the appropriate parent. Nigej (talk) 16:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Added Category:Ohio high school sports conferences. This graphical timeline is relevant to the page and should not be deleted. Usaf_1832 (talk) 02:06, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The concern was never whether or not it had a category. The timeline is not needed on a separate space. And one already exists on the mainspace. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Agree. Anyone wanting to duplicate it (which generally they shouldn't do) can simply copy it from East Central Ohio League. Of course it's better to simply WP:LINK to it, that's what links are for. Nigej (talk) 14:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this timeline already exists (hardcoded there, not using this template) at East Central Ohio League#Members, which is the only place it's needed. So template is not needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Events at the 2012 Arctic Winter Games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Navbox with 100% red links. Maybe someday, but this is too soon. Delete or userfy. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:47, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete or userfy Category:2012 Arctic Winter Games has just the one article, so there's no requirement to navigate between them. Nigej (talk) 16:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete until such a time as the redlinks are created. I notice that the 2014 Games template has all blue links, so maybe someone will create the 2012 Games articles. But until they do, template is pointless. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:40, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:U.S. places edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This navbox contains an unpredictable mix of links to categories and list articles, which may violate WP:EGG. Proper functionality is already provided by {{United States topic}}, as used at the bottom of List of places in Maine. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:28, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GASC Timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, and appears infeasible as a horizontal timeline. Abandoned after a single edit in June 2021. Appears to be single-article content that could work as a vertical timeline at List of justices of the Supreme Court of Georgia (U.S. state), but nothing here is usable for that. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as an abandoned attempt. There's no way a horizontal timeline for this sort of thing could ever be useful for navigation. Vast amounts of scrolling would be required. As noted there's a perfectly useable list article which does the job. Nigej (talk) 16:27, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • I created this template, feel free to delete. Brad (talk) 22:53, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sri Lankan Poetry edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No trancslusions. Fails WP:NAVBOX: no main article about the topic. Has only one link to a relevant page (List of Sri Lankan poets). – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:15, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment There's quite a few Sri Lankan poets in the article noted and in Sri Lankan literature but whether an expansion including a list of names would be useful is not clear to me. One problem is that there's no real parent article that binds the poets together, other than these 2 lists. Nigej (talk) 16:31, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mazatlán F.C. (women) squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. All red links except for the manager. The fact that these articles do not exist is probably evidence of systemic bias and Euroamerican male hegemony, on Wikipedia, but nevertheless, it's too soon for this template. I'm happy for it to be userfied until it is ready, since it took some work to create and will probably be useful once the articles exist. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:59, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Userfy per nom. The parent article Mazatlán F.C. (women) has the squad which is currently 100% red links. Let's have a handful of articles before we even consider a navbox. Content first then navbox if required. Nigej (talk) 15:46, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not enough links. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:53, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not enough links to justify a template, as 0 of the players have an article at the moment. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 17:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - too many redlinks, not needed. GiantSnowman 17:48, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jainism count edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. The code in this template simply counts the number of pages in a group of categories, which can easily be done directly on a project page or category page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:54, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GetContent edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. No substantive edits since creation in June 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:52, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Diplomatic missions in Peru edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 January 18. Izno (talk) 18:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Diplomatic missions in Libya edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 January 18. Izno (talk) 18:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cities in the United States by population Footer edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. {{USPopulousCities}} appears to be preferred. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:42, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Clearly we don't need both (it would just be confusing to readers to have both in any article) and currently the other is used. Whether the current content of {{USPopulousCities}} is best, is not really relevant here, but maybe the prose style would be better. Another not really relevant question is whether we need either. The US rank is given in the infobox with a link to List of United States cities by population and I can't see many readers using either navbox for navigation between cities, they'd go to the main article. Nigej (talk) 15:38, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CBS Eye Animation Productions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:43, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This template seems to be a product of testing or confusion. See {{Cartoonito original programming}} and {{CBS Animated productions}} for the actual transcluded templates that contain these shows and link to main articles matching the name and title of this template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Republika Srpska Barnstar of Merit edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:54, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created for a deleted WikiProject by a user who was banned a few months later for socking. Gonnym (talk) 13:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hollow Knight edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox contains only 2 articles, too few for a proper navigation box. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:25, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not useful for navigation. Just two articles, the parent and to-be-released sequel. Nigej (talk) 12:00, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment When I decided to create the navbox I had thought it wouldve been useful to have the navbox cuz of the sequel existing but if it really is too little articles for the guidelines, it can be deleted if more things cant be added to it now.
  • Delete per nom. —Dexxor (talk) 05:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Legal status edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

handful of random examples of "legal status" that should become a simple list in the main article. fgnievinski (talk) 00:39, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_January_11&oldid=1066564818"