Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 May 3

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< May 2 May 4 >

May 3 edit

Template:Finedetail edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:02, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An accessibility problem, and better templates do the same thing. This template is used only in 8 articles, and could be superseded by the already extant and widely used note style, where extra details are provided a la the style of a reference. Also, its limited use means that most users wouldn't know how to use it anyway. I had to have it pointed out to me, as I had never seen it before, and was unsure its usage until I looked up its documentation. The average reader is not going to do that, which means we have useless green text in a few articles. If the template is kept, it certainly needs some tweaking, as the green text is almost impossible to distinguish, at least for myself who has visual processing issues. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:59, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RMNote edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 May 11. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 12:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:R to hashtag edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was already deleted by Fastily. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 01:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No uses currently and unlikely to be used. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete You can't have a hash symbol in a title and it is currently unused.– BrandonXLF (talk) 01:17, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Unlikely to be used. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:31, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

WikiProject Indian Super League templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:06, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Templates associated with a deleted WikiProject (MFD here), pointless and/or unused. GiantSnowman 07:35, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 07:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. A lot of unnecessary bureaucracy for a defunct WP, also some have typos and if recreate will be recreated with alternate spelling (researcher). --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:31, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Bizarre. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 03:23, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kl edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

undocumented and unnecessary template used on only 1 user page (its creator). Can be moved to their userspace. Gonnym (talk) 01:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Non-English-language external links category edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 May 10. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 15:20, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Interwikitmp-grp edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 17:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template for keeping track of templates with the same purpose on other projects used on a handful of pages. While the underlying feature is occasionally useful it is done far better by Wikidata interwiki links which doesn't require people to edit the documentation each time a template is created/deleted/moved on another project. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 00:42, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_May_3&oldid=957037681"