Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 May 29

< May 28	May 30 >

May 29 edit

Template:Sharat Katariya edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sharat Katariya (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only has one link other than the director himself. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:51, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Extended periodic table (by Aufbau, 50 columns, period 8) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 15:09, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Extended periodic table (by Aufbau, 50 columns, period 8) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, no foreseeable use since these elements have not yet been discovered. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 15:33, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Forseeable for illustrating the history of the extended periodic table, as this shows the 8th period as Seaborg originally suggested it (available for example here). Double sharp (talk) 15:43, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:18, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Winged Blades^Godric 10:58, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. First, Double sharp is one of the editors maintaining the extended (row 8 and up) periodic tables. Per their note above ("Forseeable for illustrating the history ... Seaborg ..."), this may be added to enwiki in a short time. The nom's notion "no use because these elements are not discovered" is incorrect: this part of the periodic table is theorised heavily, for example how & where the (as yet non-existant) g-block would appear. - DePiep (talk) 14:24, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per DePiep. The several dozen WP:RS listed in Extended periodic table readily show that the scientific community carries on a great deal of discussion about elements as yet undiscovered. YBG (talk) 04:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note by now, this template is used in mainspace (see Extended periodic table). - DePiep (talk) 06:19, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Extended periodic table (by Aufbau, 50 columns, compact) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 15:09, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Extended periodic table (by Aufbau, 50 columns, compact) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. No forseeable use since the period 8 elements have not yet been discovered. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 15:38, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Forseeable for illustrating the history of the extended periodic table, as this shows the 8th period as Seaborg originally suggested it (available for example here). Double sharp (talk) 15:43, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:18, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Winged Blades^Godric 10:58, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. First, Double sharp is one of the editors maintaining the extended (row 8 and up) periodic tables content. Per their note above ("Forseeable for illustrating the history ... Seaborg ..."), this may be added to enwiki in a short time. The nom's notion like "no use because these elements are not discovered" is incorrect: this part of the periodic table is theorised heavily, for example how & where the (as yet non-existant) g-block would appear. - DePiep (talk) 14:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per DePiep. The several dozen WP:RS listed in Extended periodic table readily show that the scientific community carries on a great deal of discussion about elements as yet undiscovered. YBG (talk) 04:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:TemplateData dependencies edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 15:11, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Text (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Module:Multilingual (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
~~Module:WLink (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)~~

These modules were imported as dependencies of Module:TemplateData, which I've just rewritten to avoid using them, thus are no longer needed. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 20:01, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, while I imported these here it was only upon a RFPI request. See request from @GKFX:. — xaosflux ^Talk 20:31, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I need to merge in a number of changes from upstream (PerfektesChaos at dewiki), which is more complicated with missing dependencies. Given that upstream is still developing the module, I really don't want to lose the dependencies since it would just make it difficult to do future updates. User:GKFX^talk 01:16, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Striking Module:WLink for now, just realized this is in use somewhere else. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 11:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:39, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm leaning toward delete. The uses of Text which are not captured in String should probably be added there (pending some talk page discussion). The use of Multilingual isn't obvious to me OTOH, especially since our content is not broadly multilingual. --Izno (talk) 12:39, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: both modules are unused. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 00:38, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:36, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Winged Blades^Godric 10:57, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TheStart edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 June 7. Primefac (talk) 15:12, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TheStart (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Translation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was procedural close. Sorry I didn't see this one earlier, but redirects (even template redirects) should be discussed at WP:RFD. Primefac (talk) 15:06, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Translation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Old redirected template. Most uses of it is wrong and confusing. Correct usage should use Template:Translation sidebar instead and this template be deleted. Not used in article namespace. Tholme (talk) 18:58, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).