Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 June 30

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< June 29 July 1 >

June 30 edit

Template:Editnotices/Page/Template:Rail-interchange edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:15, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template editors should know not to fiddle with template-protected templates; this editnotice is therefore unnecessary. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 12:44, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep It's an evidently simple template (from the outside), which on examination turns into a nightmare of incohesive data assembled from everywhere. The editnotice is certainly justified.
    OTOH, I'd love to see the template go. This is the opposite of what templates are good for. Instead of simplifying the intricacies of MediaWiki so that content may be passed through it, this is instead a repository of all the world's disparate content related to rail interchanges, stored overlapping in one place. It's a database, not a template. There is no need for any such single template to be used from these 19,000 places, and likewise it has become unmaintainable. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Andy Dingley: If you can think of a better way to do this, let's hear it. At least this template keeps the coding consistent ({{NYCS time 2}} and {{LACMTA icon}} notwithstanding). The alternative is what was done with German rail icons (see Template:Rail-interchange/doc/DE: templates for each individual city and system, with no consistency with respect to naming, structure, content, etc. Useddenim (talk) 13:02, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I created this editnotice because some people were frequently making breaking changes to the live template, without sandboxing their intentions first. Such misjudged acts compromised thousands of pages. We still get people making untested direct edits, see for example Template talk:Rail-interchange#Edit request: 23 June 2018. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:15, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Types of crowns edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:15, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Types of crowns with Template:Headgear.
Largely logical, considering the other types of headgears listed. Chicbyaccident (talk) 21:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:09, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:States of Nazi Germany edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 9. Primefac (talk) 00:47, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hungarian Golden Ball edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus with NPASR provided the distinction as to why this template is a duplicate of a seemingly-disparate template. Primefac (talk) 02:40, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We have just {{Hungarian Footballer of the Year}}, no need to do another one Unikalinho (talk) 04:07, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 10:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Hhkohh (talk) 10:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as incomplete duplicate. GiantSnowman 10:30, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Dreamy Jazz talk | contribs 12:05, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This is a different award to the one given by the Hungarian Football Federation (MLSZ), it is given by the Association of Hungarian Journalists (MÚOSZ). A similar award to this would probably be the FWA Footballer of the Year. APM (talk) 14:45, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I am relisting this because of the difference in content - should the nominated template be merged into the other template before deletion? Is it just incorrect? Is the award itself not worth a template?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:08, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - as per APM, this appears to be a separate award to the Footballer of the Year. This article mentions it: it says that Dzsudzsák has been named player of the year by the Hungarian Football Association, but then says "Dzsudzsák will fly to Budapest this afternoon to receive a second award. He has also been nominated in the annual ballot of sports journalists and will receive a golden ball tonight." It would appear, therefore, that these are two separate awards. The Golden Ball template definitely needs updating (and someone who knows Hungarian might be a help in finding sources), but I don't think it should be deleted. 21.colinthompson (talk) 16:13, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep, looks like two different awards. Frietjes (talk) 22:52, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Amazon Video Foreign Language Programming edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 July 23. (non-admin closure) Hhkohh (talk) 16:09, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_June_30&oldid=851634269"