Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 December 24

December 24Edit

Template:Location map Russia Vologda Oblast Nyuksensky DistrictEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:31, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

unused; better to us {{mapframe}} map. Frietjes (talk) 21:31, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Location map Russia Nenetskiy OkrugEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:31, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

unused, probably replaced by a map using the image with the AlternativeMap parameter Frietjes (talk) 21:30, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Unused. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:55, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Location map Russia VoronezhEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:31, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

unused; better to us a {{mapframe}} map for cities. Frietjes (talk) 21:28, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Location map TranscaucasiaEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

unused, not clear where it would be used Frietjes (talk) 21:20, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Unused. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:55, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Location map Ukraine AlushtaEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

unused, better to use Module:Location map/data/Crimea or a {{mapframe}} map. Frietjes (talk) 21:18, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Unused. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:55, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Location map United Kingdom Greater Manchester with former districtsEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

replaced by the AlternativeMap in Module:Location map/data/United Kingdom Greater Manchester Frietjes (talk) 21:14, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Unused. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:55, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Location map Upper GalileeEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

unused and better to use Module:Location map/data/Israel northeast and Module:Location map/data/Israel northwest which have English labels Frietjes (talk) 21:12, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Unused. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:55, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FnaticEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 01:20, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Propose deleting
Another bare esports navbox template that fails its sole purpose of navigation. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 19:03, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Daily CFD logsEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Daily archive log per the discussion. Primefac (talk) 04:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Propose merging Template:Daily CFD logs with Template:Daily archive log.
These 2 templates are similar to each other. The differences are that the version specific to CfD has "index" links, and unlike the general XfD version, shows links to future dates. There is no need to have 2 separate templates if one can just add an "index" parameter directly to Template:Daily archive log. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:05, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:38, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Merge. Good idea. --Bsherr (talk) 03:03, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Merge reasonable Hhkohh (talk) 01:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox NFL DraftEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox sports draft. Primefac (talk) 01:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Propose merging Template:Infobox NFL Draft with Template:Infobox sports draft.
So this is one where I'm actually on the fence... I'm all for Infobox consolidation but I have a feeling this might be a case for keeping a separate template. The NFL draft seems to have a number of parameters/fields that are unique to it. I'm thinking it might be good to add a few |custom= fields to {{Infobox sports draft}} and then make {{Infobox NFL Draft}} a custom wrapper? Seeking feedback... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:24, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 04:59, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:02, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Keep Don't see any issue with having it be its own thing, and having to merge/consolidate parameters just to make everything use a single navbox creates extra work for no real benefit. Can the OP explain why they should be merged besides just wanting them consolidated? ~ Dissident93 (talk) 19:05, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Merge - looking over the parameters they all seem pretty much the same. Slight variations include Template:Infobox NFL Draft incorrectly applying the label/field model for most selections/fewest selections, where it includes a value in the label field. Merging similar templates, not only benefits editors who don't need to jump through hops to figure out which template to use, but it also keeps the template in-check from being incorrectly designed. --Gonnym (talk) 13:25, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Merge per Gonnym. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:41, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Merge There is nothing too unique about an NFL draft that cannot be normalized. On the subject of the most selections/fewest selections parameters, those are quite trivial and should be outright deleted and not merged. Infoboxes should not be a dumping ground for information that would not be worthy of prose.—Bagumba (talk) 11:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).