Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 23

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< September 22 September 24 >

September 23 edit

Template:Khowar language edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 4. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 16:20, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List of role-playing video games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 4. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 11:01, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Dalai Lama and Template:Infobox religious biography edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 4. (non-admin closure) J947(c) (m) 03:33, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox LLWSQualifiers-Pre2001 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) feminist 15:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: {{Infobox_LLWSQualifiers}} should probably have the same keep/delete fate as this template. It's also unused, and both templates are recommended for use at WikiProject Baseball/Little_League_task_force. The task force page has been inactive for a few years, but here's a ping to taskforce member User:JB82. JB82 is still actively editing, and active on this topic. Alsee (talk) 16:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: It's less arduous than creating a table (and probably less time-consuming, too). --JB82 (talk) 01:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • JB82, the template is unused. I pinged you and posted on the Little League wikiproject to see if there was any likelihood it was going to used in the foreseeable future. However looking more closely at the Little League wikiproject, I suddenly realize that it never actually existed. I couldn't find a single instance of dialog in the last 11 years. Out of the handful of edits there, several were bots or people passing through on maintenance tasks. Alsee (talk) 16:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • Alright, then... --JB82 (talk) 15:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 17:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox carom billiards player edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 4. (non-admin closure) J947(c) (m) 03:32, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ontario crown corporations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 12:32, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Existence of this template is redundant since Template:ONGovDept already includes a comprehensive list of provincial Crown agencies and Crown corporations. RA0808 talkcontribs 16:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (creator of template) Daylen (talk) 19:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Meta country at games navboxes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 16:20, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full list

These templates (87 in total) are simply wrappers for {{country at games navbox}}. The main template updates automatically, meaning each of these templates are just shells. Another reason is to prevent the unnecessary creation of these templates, as demonstrated by the deletion of 20 similar unused templates. As a note, while I am advocating for deletion of these templates, obviously they should be subst'ed/replaced to keep the information itself on the page (which I'm happy to do). Primefac (talk) 16:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Red Star Belgrade squad 1991 European Cup Final edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) feminist 15:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:FOOTY consensus, we only have historical squad navboxes for international tournaments, not for club competitions. Jellyman (talk) 15:52, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spain Squad EuroBasket 1959 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 12:31, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per prior consensus we don't need roster boxes for teams that didn't medal in the competition. Frietjes (talk) 14:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, navbox creep. We don't need a squad template for every team in every competition. That would cause an explosion at the bottom of articles for players with a long career. If someone wants to know who was on which squad, we can put that in the articles. The standard bar for a squad navbox is if it is a championship team for a significant competition. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spain Squad 2014 FIBA Basketball World Cup edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 12:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per prior consensus we don't need roster boxes for teams that didn't medal in the competition. Frietjes (talk) 14:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • All the squads that competes at this World Cup have their own template. I absolutely disagree with this proposed delation. Puente aereo (talk) 13:44, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, navbox creep. We don't need a squad template for every team in every competition. That would cause an explosion at the bottom of articles for players with a long career. If someone wants to know who was on which squad, we can put that in the articles. The standard bar for a squad navbox is if it is a championship team for a significant competition. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:TCREEP. Teams should earn a medal at a minimum. How many of these bios mention a fourth place finish in their leads?—Bagumba (talk) 09:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spain Squad 1950 FIBA World Championship edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) feminist 15:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per prior consensus we don't need roster boxes for teams that didn't medal in the competition. Frietjes (talk) 14:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • All the squads that competes at the FIBA World Championship have their own template. I absolutely disagree with this proposed delation. Puente aereo (talk) 13:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, navbox creep. We don't need a squad template for every team in every competition. That would cause an explosion at the bottom of articles for players with a long career. If someone wants to know who was on which squad, we can put that in the articles. The standard bar for a squad navbox is if it is a championship team for a significant competition. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:17, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:TCREEP, as well as prior consensus cited in nom. Teams that do not earn a medal do not need the Wikipedia equivalent of a participation award.—Bagumba (talk) 08:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Most populous cities in the Republic of India edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Cyp (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates the function of Template:Million-plus agglomerations in India. DrKay (talk) 07:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hull & Barnsley Railway (inline) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) feminist 15:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Use {{Hull & Barnsley Railway}} instead. Jc86035 (talk) 04:46, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, was probably a useful fork at one point in time, but it's not needed now. Frietjes (talk) 14:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_September_23&oldid=1073610729"